Can a Novel Light Weight Minimal Support Lifting Exoskeleton Modify Lifting Movement in People without Low Back Pain?

Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to lifting-related disabilities. To minimize the risk of back pain, emerging technologies known as lifting exoskeletons were designed to optimize lifting movements. However, it is currently unknown whether a minimally supportive exoskeleton can alter the lifting movement in people without LBP. This study aims to investigate if wearing a novel lightweight exoskeleton that minimally supports the back, hip, and knee can alter the lifting range of motion and movement variations in people without LBP. This study also aims to investigate if wearing this novel exoskeleton can result in a reliable between-day lifting movement. In two separate sessions (each one week apart), fourteen participants lifted a box (that weighed 10% of their body weight) ten times, once while wearing an exoskeleton and once while not wearing an exoskeleton. Wearing the novel exoskeleton during lifting produced moderate-high, test-retest reliability (Trunk: ICC<sub>3,1</sub> = 0.89, 95% CI [0.67, 0.96], SEM = 9.34°; Hip: ICC<sub>3,1</sub> = 0.63, 95% CI [0.22, 0.88], SEM = 2.57°; Knee: ICC<sub>3,1</sub> = 0.61, 95% CI [0.23, 0.87], SEM = 2.50°). Wearing an exoskeleton significantly decreased the range of motion of the knee (F<sub>1,4</sub> = 4.83, <i>p</i> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.06). Additionally, wearing an exoskeleton significantly decreased hip (diff = 8.38, <i>p</i> = 0.045) and knee (diff = -8.57, <i>p</i> = 0.038) movement variability; however, wearing an exoskeleton did not decrease the movement variability of the body's trunk (diff = 0.60, <i>p</i> = 1.00). Therefore, minimally supported lifting through the use of exoskeletons can modify movement in people without LBP and produce reliable lifting movements. Wearing the novel exoskeleton is also desirable for monitoring lifting movements. Future studies should investigate the use of sensors and IMU to monitor lifting movement at work with the least amount of intrusion on an individual's movement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24155067
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can a Novel Light Weight Minimal Support Lifting Exoskeleton Modify Lifting Movement in People without Low Back Pain?

Tamer Burjawi, Rifai Chai, Adrian Pranata, Matthew Arrowsmith
1 citations
Sensors
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
0.45
article

Can a Novel Light Weight Minimal Support Lifting Exoskeleton Modify Lifting Movement in People without Low Back Pain?

Tamer Burjawi, Rifai Chai, Adrian Pranata, Matthew Arrowsmith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to lifting-related disabilities. To minimize the risk of back pain, emerging technologies known as lifting exoskeletons were designed to optimize lifting movements. However, it is currently unknown whether a minimally supportive exoskeleton can alter the lifting movement in people without LBP. This study aims to investigate if wearing a novel lightweight exoskeleton that minimally supports the back, hip, and knee can alter the lifting range of motion and movement variations in people without LBP. This study also aims to investigate if wearing this novel exoskeleton can result in a reliable between-day lifting movement. In two separate sessions (each one week apart), fourteen participants lifted a box (that weighed 10% of their body weight) ten times, once while wearing an exoskeleton and once while not wearing an exoskeleton. Wearing the novel exoskeleton during lifting produced moderate-high, test-retest reliability (Trunk: ICC<sub>3,1</sub> = 0.89, 95% CI [0.67, 0.96], SEM = 9.34°; Hip: ICC<sub>3,1</sub> = 0.63, 95% CI [0.22, 0.88], SEM = 2.57°; Knee: ICC<sub>3,1</sub> = 0.61, 95% CI [0.23, 0.87], SEM = 2.50°). Wearing an exoskeleton significantly decreased the range of motion of the knee (F<sub>1,4</sub> = 4.83, <i>p</i> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.06). Additionally, wearing an exoskeleton significantly decreased hip (diff = 8.38, <i>p</i> = 0.045) and knee (diff = -8.57, <i>p</i> = 0.038) movement variability; however, wearing an exoskeleton did not decrease the movement variability of the body's trunk (diff = 0.60, <i>p</i> = 1.00). Therefore, minimally supported lifting through the use of exoskeletons can modify movement in people without LBP and produce reliable lifting movements. Wearing the novel exoskeleton is also desirable for monitoring lifting movements. Future studies should investigate the use of sensors and IMU to monitor lifting movement at work with the least amount of intrusion on an individual's movement.

SensorsVol. 24(15)
Swinburne University of Technology (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Swinburne University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.