Ten questions concerning statistical data analysis in human-centric buildings research: A focus on thermal comfort investigations

Given the large amount of time we spend indoors, designing and operating buildings that are safe, comfortable, and conducive to productivity and well-being is essential. To achieve this goal, in the past decades, research has been conducted to investigate the influence of the indoor environment on occupants. Thermal comfort has been the subject of most investigations in this field. However, despite being a consolidated research topic since the 1920s, statistical practices for analysing thermal comfort data often rely on simplified premises, which may be due to several possible factors (e.g., limited computational capabilities and lack of training). Consequently, important aspects of data analysis are often absent or overlooked. Recent statistics and statistical software advances have provided more options for effectively modelling complex issues. However, properly using these tools requires a solid understanding of statistical analysis, increasing the risk of misuse in practice. This paper presents ten questions highlighting the most critical issues regarding statistical analysis for thermal comfort research and practice. The first four questions provide general perspectives concerning statistical data analysis, while the remaining ones address specific problems related to thermal comfort research, but that can extend to all human-centric research in the built environment. Additionally, the last five questions demonstrate the practical significance of analysis pitfalls (i.e., sampling variability, selection bias, variable selection, clustered/nested observations, and measurement error) through examples with synthetic data. This study provides insights into the current statistical ‘habits’ in thermal comfort research and, more importantly, help researchers better define and conduct their statistical analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111903
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten questions concerning statistical data analysis in human-centric buildings research: A focus on thermal comfort investigations

Jan Kloppenborg Møller, Andrew Sonta, Matteo Favero, Giorgia Chinazzo et al.
18 citations
Building and Environment
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
4.77
article

Ten questions concerning statistical data analysis in human-centric buildings research: A focus on thermal comfort investigations

Jan Kloppenborg Møller, Andrew Sonta, Matteo Favero, Giorgia Chinazzo, Marcel Schweiker, Salvatore Carlucci, Marika Vellei
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Given the large amount of time we spend indoors, designing and operating buildings that are safe, comfortable, and conducive to productivity and well-being is essential. To achieve this goal, in the past decades, research has been conducted to investigate the influence of the indoor environment on occupants. Thermal comfort has been the subject of most investigations in this field. However, despite being a consolidated research topic since the 1920s, statistical practices for analysing thermal comfort data often rely on simplified premises, which may be due to several possible factors (e.g., limited computational capabilities and lack of training). Consequently, important aspects of data analysis are often absent or overlooked. Recent statistics and statistical software advances have provided more options for effectively modelling complex issues. However, properly using these tools requires a solid understanding of statistical analysis, increasing the risk of misuse in practice. This paper presents ten questions highlighting the most critical issues regarding statistical analysis for thermal comfort research and practice. The first four questions provide general perspectives concerning statistical data analysis, while the remaining ones address specific problems related to thermal comfort research, but that can extend to all human-centric research in the built environment. Additionally, the last five questions demonstrate the practical significance of analysis pitfalls (i.e., sampling variability, selection bias, variable selection, clustered/nested observations, and measurement error) through examples with synthetic data. This study provides insights into the current statistical ‘habits’ in thermal comfort research and, more importantly, help researchers better define and conduct their statistical analyses.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 264
Northwestern University (US), University of Insubria (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Arts et Métiers (FR), Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux (FR), HESAM Université (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Villum Fonden, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
4.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.