Pollutant Emissions and Oxidative Potentials of Particles from the Indoor Burning of Biomass Pellets

Residential solid fuel combustion significantly impacts air quality and human health. Pelletized biomass fuels are promoted as a cleaner alternative, particularly for those who cannot afford the high costs of gas/electricity, but their emission characteristics and potential effects remain poorly understood. The present laboratory-based study evaluated pollution emissions from pelletized biomass burning, including CH<sub>4</sub> (methane), NMHC (nonmethane hydrocarbon compounds), CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm), OC (organic carbon), EC (element carbon), PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), EPFRs (environmentally persistent free radicals), and OP (oxidative potential) of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and compared with those from raw biomass burning. For most targets, except for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, the mass-based emission factors for pelletized biomass were 62-96% lower than those for raw biomass. SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> levels were negatively correlated with other air pollutants (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Based on real-world daily consumption data, this study estimated that households using pelletized biomass could achieve significant reductions (51-95%) in emissions of CH<sub>4</sub>, NMHC, CO, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, OC, EC, PAHs, and EPFRs compared to those using raw biomass, while the differences in emissions of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> were statistically insignificant. The reduction rate of benzo(a)pyrene-equivalent emissions was only 16%, much lower than the reduction in the total PAH mass (78%). This is primarily attributed to the more PAHs with high toxic potentials, such as dibenz(a,h)anthracene, in the pelletized biomass emissions. Consequently, impacts on human health associated with PAHs might be overestimated if only the mass of total PAHs was counted. The OP of particles from the pellet burning was also significantly lower than that from raw biomass by 96%. The results suggested that pelletized biomass could be a transitional substitution option that can significantly improve air quality and mitigate human exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c03967
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pollutant Emissions and Oxidative Potentials of Particles from the Indoor Burning of Biomass Pellets

Guofeng Shen, Shu Min Tao, Ran Xing, Yaojie Li et al.
19 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Air Quality and Health Impacts
5.98
article

Pollutant Emissions and Oxidative Potentials of Particles from the Indoor Burning of Biomass Pellets

Guofeng Shen, Shu Min Tao, Ran Xing, Yaojie Li, Jin Li, Bo Pan, Lu Zhang, Xiangdong Li, Xinlei Liu, Jinfeng Zhao
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Residential solid fuel combustion significantly impacts air quality and human health. Pelletized biomass fuels are promoted as a cleaner alternative, particularly for those who cannot afford the high costs of gas/electricity, but their emission characteristics and potential effects remain poorly understood. The present laboratory-based study evaluated pollution emissions from pelletized biomass burning, including CH<sub>4</sub> (methane), NMHC (nonmethane hydrocarbon compounds), CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm), OC (organic carbon), EC (element carbon), PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), EPFRs (environmentally persistent free radicals), and OP (oxidative potential) of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and compared with those from raw biomass burning. For most targets, except for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, the mass-based emission factors for pelletized biomass were 62-96% lower than those for raw biomass. SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> levels were negatively correlated with other air pollutants (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Based on real-world daily consumption data, this study estimated that households using pelletized biomass could achieve significant reductions (51-95%) in emissions of CH<sub>4</sub>, NMHC, CO, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, OC, EC, PAHs, and EPFRs compared to those using raw biomass, while the differences in emissions of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> were statistically insignificant. The reduction rate of benzo(a)pyrene-equivalent emissions was only 16%, much lower than the reduction in the total PAH mass (78%). This is primarily attributed to the more PAHs with high toxic potentials, such as dibenz(a,h)anthracene, in the pelletized biomass emissions. Consequently, impacts on human health associated with PAHs might be overestimated if only the mass of total PAHs was counted. The OP of particles from the pellet burning was also significantly lower than that from raw biomass by 96%. The results suggested that pelletized biomass could be a transitional substitution option that can significantly improve air quality and mitigate human exposure.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 58(36)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Peking University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
5.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.