Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice

Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRiMER
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.148162
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice

José E. Rodríguez, Edgar Figueroa, Kendall M. Campbell, Donna Baluchi
1 citations
PRiMER
Health Sciences Research and Education
0.85
article

Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice

José E. Rodríguez, Edgar Figueroa, Kendall M. Campbell, Donna Baluchi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.

PRiMERVol. 8
Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
American Board of Family Medicine Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Health Sciences Research and Education
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.