Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study

Adjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O from an initial value of 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study

Věra Špatenková, Mikuláš Mlček, Alan Mejstrik, Eduard Kuriščák et al.
2 citations
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
0.84
article

Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study

Věra Špatenková, Mikuláš Mlček, Alan Mejstrik, Eduard Kuriščák, Lukas Cisar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Adjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O from an initial value of 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.

Intensive Care Medicine ExperimentalVol. 12(1)
Technical University of Liberec (CZ), Charles University (CZ), Krajská Nemocnice Liberec (CZ), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology (CZ)
Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study — Věra Špatenková, Mikuláš Mlček, et al. · Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS