Generating fuel consumption maps on prescribed fire experiments from airborne laser scanning

Background Characterisation of fuel consumption provides critical insights into fire behaviour, effects, and emissions. Stand-replacing prescribed fire experiments in central Utah offered an opportunity to generate consumption estimates in coordination with other research efforts. Aims We sought to generate fuel consumption maps using pre- and post-fire airborne laser scanning (ALS) and ground measurements and to test the spatial transferability of the ALS-derived fuel models. Methods Using random forest (RF), we empirically modelled fuel load and estimated consumption from pre- and post-fire differences. We used cross-validation to assess RF model performance and test spatial transferability. Key results Consumption estimates for overstory fuels were more precise and accurate than for subcanopy fuels. Transferring RF models to provide consumption estimates in areas without ground training data resulted in loss of precision and accuracy. Conclusions Fuel consumption maps were produced and are available for researchers who collected coincident fire behaviour, effects, and emissions data. The precision and accuracy of these data vary by fuel type. Transferability of the models to novel areas depends on the user’s tolerance for error. Implications This study fills a critical need in the broader set of research efforts linking fire behaviour, effects, and emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wf23160
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating fuel consumption maps on prescribed fire experiments from airborne laser scanning

Benjamin C. Bright, James B. Cronan, Adam C. Watts, Roger D. Ottmar et al.
6 citations
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.98
article

Generating fuel consumption maps on prescribed fire experiments from airborne laser scanning

Benjamin C. Bright, James B. Cronan, Adam C. Watts, Roger D. Ottmar, T. Ryan McCarley, Andrew Thomas Hudak, Paige Eagle
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Background Characterisation of fuel consumption provides critical insights into fire behaviour, effects, and emissions. Stand-replacing prescribed fire experiments in central Utah offered an opportunity to generate consumption estimates in coordination with other research efforts. Aims We sought to generate fuel consumption maps using pre- and post-fire airborne laser scanning (ALS) and ground measurements and to test the spatial transferability of the ALS-derived fuel models. Methods Using random forest (RF), we empirically modelled fuel load and estimated consumption from pre- and post-fire differences. We used cross-validation to assess RF model performance and test spatial transferability. Key results Consumption estimates for overstory fuels were more precise and accurate than for subcanopy fuels. Transferring RF models to provide consumption estimates in areas without ground training data resulted in loss of precision and accuracy. Conclusions Fuel consumption maps were produced and are available for researchers who collected coincident fire behaviour, effects, and emissions data. The precision and accuracy of these data vary by fuel type. Transferability of the models to novel areas depends on the user’s tolerance for error. Implications This study fills a critical need in the broader set of research efforts linking fire behaviour, effects, and emissions.

International Journal of Wildland FireVol. 33(8)
University of Idaho (US), University of Washington (US), Pacific Northwest Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Joint Fire Science Program, U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.