Ways of “Not Hearing”: Corporate Denial in the Case of Aircraft Noise and Victimisation in the UK

Abstract The elusive power dynamics behind the victimisation of aircraft noise pollution, a neglected type of invisible environmental harm, is the main concern of this study. I examine these dynamics through first-hand accounts of individuals’ aircraft noise complaint experiences with the airports in London, UK. An analysis of these experiences reveals specificities of corporate denial strategies in minimising or ignoring noise and the victims. I identify two different uses, namely reconstructive and obfuscation, of technical denial of cause, as the distinct types with which the individuals’ noise claims are confronted. As such, the paper contributes to our understanding of the experience of being an environmental victim. It also illustrates how the specific forms of corporate denial operate to the advantage of the powerful and contribute to victimisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Criminology
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-024-09777-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ways of “Not Hearing”: Corporate Denial in the Case of Aircraft Noise and Victimisation in the UK

Ayşegül Yıldırım
1 citations
Critical Criminology
Geographies of human-animal interactions
1.96
article

Ways of “Not Hearing”: Corporate Denial in the Case of Aircraft Noise and Victimisation in the UK

Ayşegül Yıldırım
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The elusive power dynamics behind the victimisation of aircraft noise pollution, a neglected type of invisible environmental harm, is the main concern of this study. I examine these dynamics through first-hand accounts of individuals’ aircraft noise complaint experiences with the airports in London, UK. An analysis of these experiences reveals specificities of corporate denial strategies in minimising or ignoring noise and the victims. I identify two different uses, namely reconstructive and obfuscation, of technical denial of cause, as the distinct types with which the individuals’ noise claims are confronted. As such, the paper contributes to our understanding of the experience of being an environmental victim. It also illustrates how the specific forms of corporate denial operate to the advantage of the powerful and contribute to victimisation.

Critical CriminologyVol. 32(3)
Goldsmiths University of London (GB), Gaziantep University (TR)
Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Milli Eğitim Bakanliği
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.