Quantitative Comparison of Deparaffinization, Rehydration, and Extraction Methods for FFPE Tissue Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are suitable for proteomic and phosphoproteomic biomarker studies by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The choice of the sample preparation method influences the number, intensity, and reproducibility of identifications. By comparing four deparaffinization and rehydration methods, including heptane, histolene, SubX, and xylene, we found that heptane and methanol produced the lowest coefficients of variation (CVs). Using this, five extraction methods from the literature were modified and evaluated for their performance using kidney, leg muscle, lung, and testicular rat organs. All methods performed well, except for SP3 due to insufficient tissue lysis. Heat n' Beat was the fastest and most reproducible method with the highest digestion efficiency and lowest CVs. S-Trap produced the highest peptide yield, while TFE produced the best phosphopeptide enrichment efficiency. The quantitation of FFPE-derived peptides remains an ongoing challenge with bias in UV and fluorescence assays across methods, most notably in SPEED. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that each method favored extracting some gene ontology cellular components over others including chromosome, cytoplasmic, cytoskeleton, endoplasmic reticulum, membrane, mitochondrion, and nucleoplasm protein groups. The outcome is a set of recommendations for choosing the most appropriate method for different settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04479
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Comparison of Deparaffinization, Rehydration, and Extraction Methods for FFPE Tissue Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics

Peter G. Hains, Clare Loudon, Phillip J. Robinson, George E. Craft et al.
5 citations
Analytical Chemistry
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
1.20
article

Quantitative Comparison of Deparaffinization, Rehydration, and Extraction Methods for FFPE Tissue Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics

Peter G. Hains, Clare Loudon, Phillip J. Robinson, George E. Craft, Erin M. Humphries
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are suitable for proteomic and phosphoproteomic biomarker studies by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The choice of the sample preparation method influences the number, intensity, and reproducibility of identifications. By comparing four deparaffinization and rehydration methods, including heptane, histolene, SubX, and xylene, we found that heptane and methanol produced the lowest coefficients of variation (CVs). Using this, five extraction methods from the literature were modified and evaluated for their performance using kidney, leg muscle, lung, and testicular rat organs. All methods performed well, except for SP3 due to insufficient tissue lysis. Heat n' Beat was the fastest and most reproducible method with the highest digestion efficiency and lowest CVs. S-Trap produced the highest peptide yield, while TFE produced the best phosphopeptide enrichment efficiency. The quantitation of FFPE-derived peptides remains an ongoing challenge with bias in UV and fluorescence assays across methods, most notably in SPEED. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that each method favored extracting some gene ontology cellular components over others including chromosome, cytoplasmic, cytoskeleton, endoplasmic reticulum, membrane, mitochondrion, and nucleoplasm protein groups. The outcome is a set of recommendations for choosing the most appropriate method for different settings.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 96(33)
The University of Sydney (AU), Children's Medical Research Institute (AU)
Australian Government, Australian Cancer Research Foundation, National Breast Cancer Foundation, Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government, Ian Potter Foundation, Cancer Institute NSW, Department of Health, New South Wales Government, Tour de Cure, National Health and Medical Research Council, Cancer Council NSW, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, H2020 Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.