Disequilibrium Play in Tennis

Do the world’s best tennis pros play Nash equilibrium mixed strategies? We answer this question using data on serve-direction choices (to the receiver’s left, right, or body) from the Match Charting Project. Using a new approach, we test and reject a key implication of a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium: that the probability of winning the service game is identical for all possible serve strategies. We calculate best-response serve strategies by dynamic programming (DP) and show that for most elite pro servers, the DP strategy significantly increases their win probability relative to the mixed strategies they actually use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732529
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disequilibrium Play in Tennis

John Rust, Axel Anderson, Kin‐Ping Wong, Jeremy Rosen
6 citations
Journal of Political Economy
Sports Analytics and Performance
5.65
article

Disequilibrium Play in Tennis

John Rust, Axel Anderson, Kin‐Ping Wong, Jeremy Rosen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Do the world’s best tennis pros play Nash equilibrium mixed strategies? We answer this question using data on serve-direction choices (to the receiver’s left, right, or body) from the Match Charting Project. Using a new approach, we test and reject a key implication of a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium: that the probability of winning the service game is identical for all possible serve strategies. We calculate best-response serve strategies by dynamic programming (DP) and show that for most elite pro servers, the DP strategy significantly increases their win probability relative to the mixed strategies they actually use.

Journal of Political EconomyVol. 133(1)
Georgetown University (US), Moon Express (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports Analytics and Performance
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.