Optimizing the Influence of Fly Ash as an Anti-Sagging Additive in Highly Deviated Geothermal Well Drilling Fluids Using Surface Response Method

Weighting materials such as barite and ilmenite are crucial for controlling fluid density during deep or ultra-deep drilling operations. However, sagging poses significant challenges, especially in highly deviated high-pressure and high-temperature (HP/HT) wells. This leads to inadequate well control, wellbore instability, and variations in hydrostatic pressure in extended-reach wells. Given the challenges of experimental research, reliable prediction models are imperative for evaluating the interaction between the ratio of anti-sagging additives, temperature, and wellbore inclination on sag factor (SF). This research presents statistical-based empirical models for predicting the SF at various wellbore inclinations (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90°) and assessing the influence of fly ash on the SF. The regression equations, developed using the Response Surface Methodology in Minitab 18 software, show high reliability, with R2 values approaching unity. Contour and surface response plots provide a clear understanding of the variable interactions. The analysis reveals that sagging is most severe at 60° to 65° inclination. At 400 °F and 60° inclination, adding 4 lb/bbl of fly ash reduces sagging in barite and ilmenite-densified fluid by 63.9% and 63.1%, respectively. Model validation shows high accuracy, with percentage errors below 3%. This study offers valuable insights for optimizing drilling fluid formulations in HP/HT well environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156833
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the Influence of Fly Ash as an Anti-Sagging Additive in Highly Deviated Geothermal Well Drilling Fluids Using Surface Response Method

Adesina Fadairo, O.O.A. Oni
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Drilling and Well Engineering
0.67
article

Optimizing the Influence of Fly Ash as an Anti-Sagging Additive in Highly Deviated Geothermal Well Drilling Fluids Using Surface Response Method

Adesina Fadairo, O.O.A. Oni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Weighting materials such as barite and ilmenite are crucial for controlling fluid density during deep or ultra-deep drilling operations. However, sagging poses significant challenges, especially in highly deviated high-pressure and high-temperature (HP/HT) wells. This leads to inadequate well control, wellbore instability, and variations in hydrostatic pressure in extended-reach wells. Given the challenges of experimental research, reliable prediction models are imperative for evaluating the interaction between the ratio of anti-sagging additives, temperature, and wellbore inclination on sag factor (SF). This research presents statistical-based empirical models for predicting the SF at various wellbore inclinations (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90°) and assessing the influence of fly ash on the SF. The regression equations, developed using the Response Surface Methodology in Minitab 18 software, show high reliability, with R2 values approaching unity. Contour and surface response plots provide a clear understanding of the variable interactions. The analysis reveals that sagging is most severe at 60° to 65° inclination. At 400 °F and 60° inclination, adding 4 lb/bbl of fly ash reduces sagging in barite and ilmenite-densified fluid by 63.9% and 63.1%, respectively. Model validation shows high accuracy, with percentage errors below 3%. This study offers valuable insights for optimizing drilling fluid formulations in HP/HT well environments.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(15)
University of North Dakota (US)
North Dakota Industrial Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Drilling and Well Engineering
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.