<i>Lombard Street</i> revisited? Bagehot’s rules and Bernanke’s interpretation

Ben Bernanke first referred to Walter Bagehot’s Lombard Street when he was in the chair of the Board of Governors, and when the Federal Reserve responded to the global financial crisis that began in August 2007. While the literature has dealt with the practice of the Federal Reserve and its compliance or otherwise with Bagehot’s rules, it has not detailed Bernanke’s theory of lending in last resort and the underlying interpretation of Bagehot’s rules. Thus, our approach is not empirical but theoretical. We first recall Bagehot’s arguments especially regarding the respective levels of interest rates. Then we show how Bernanke met Bagehot and how he revisited Bagehot’s rules. We find that Bernanke’s approach can be sustained under theoretical conditions—notably working on the assumption that the fundamental value of financial assets can be identified. We conclude by emphasising that the debate can be either restricted to the question of moral hazard, or broadened to the question of the financial cycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2024.2384867
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lombard Street revisited? Bagehot’s rules and Bernanke’s interpretation

Emmanuel Carré, Laurent Le Maux
1 citations
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
0.54
article

Lombard Street revisited? Bagehot’s rules and Bernanke’s interpretation

Emmanuel Carré, Laurent Le Maux
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ben Bernanke first referred to Walter Bagehot’s Lombard Street when he was in the chair of the Board of Governors, and when the Federal Reserve responded to the global financial crisis that began in August 2007. While the literature has dealt with the practice of the Federal Reserve and its compliance or otherwise with Bagehot’s rules, it has not detailed Bernanke’s theory of lending in last resort and the underlying interpretation of Bagehot’s rules. Thus, our approach is not empirical but theoretical. We first recall Bagehot’s arguments especially regarding the respective levels of interest rates. Then we show how Bernanke met Bagehot and how he revisited Bagehot’s rules. We find that Bernanke’s approach can be sustained under theoretical conditions—notably working on the assumption that the fundamental value of financial assets can be identified. We conclude by emphasising that the debate can be either restricted to the question of moral hazard, or broadened to the question of the financial cycle.

European Journal of the History of Economic ThoughtVol. 31(5)
Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.