Tissue microarray validation in cervical carcinoma studies. A methodological approach.

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are a cost-effective tool to study biomarkers in clinical research. Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most prevalent in women worldwide, with the highest prevalence in low-middle-income countries due to a lack of organized screening. CC is associated with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Several biomarkers have been studied for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes. We aimed to evaluate and validate the effectiveness of TMA in CC compared to whole slide images (WSs). We selected and anonymized twenty cases of CC. P16, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and CD8 expression were immunohistochemically investigated. All WS were scanned and 10 representative virtual TMA cores with 0.6 mm diameter per sample were selected. Ten random combinations of 1-5 cylinders per case were assessed for each biomarker. The agreement of scoring between TMA and WS was evaluated by kappa statistics. We found that three cores of 0.6 mm on TMA can accurately represent WS in our setting. The Kappa value between TMA and WS varied from 1 for p16 to 0.61 for PD-L1. Our study presents an approach to address TMA sampling that could be generalized to TMA-based research, regardless of the tissue and biomarkers of interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14670/hh-18-796
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tissue microarray validation in cervical carcinoma studies. A methodological approach.

Lucília Lovane, Carla Carrilho, Christina Karlsson
PubMed
AI in cancer detection
article

Tissue microarray validation in cervical carcinoma studies. A methodological approach.

Lucília Lovane, Carla Carrilho, Christina Karlsson
article en

Abstract

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are a cost-effective tool to study biomarkers in clinical research. Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most prevalent in women worldwide, with the highest prevalence in low-middle-income countries due to a lack of organized screening. CC is associated with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Several biomarkers have been studied for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes. We aimed to evaluate and validate the effectiveness of TMA in CC compared to whole slide images (WSs). We selected and anonymized twenty cases of CC. P16, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and CD8 expression were immunohistochemically investigated. All WS were scanned and 10 representative virtual TMA cores with 0.6 mm diameter per sample were selected. Ten random combinations of 1-5 cylinders per case were assessed for each biomarker. The agreement of scoring between TMA and WS was evaluated by kappa statistics. We found that three cores of 0.6 mm on TMA can accurately represent WS in our setting. The Kappa value between TMA and WS varied from 1 for p16 to 0.61 for PD-L1. Our study presents an approach to address TMA sampling that could be generalized to TMA-based research, regardless of the tissue and biomarkers of interest.

PubMedVol. 40(3)
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), Örebro University (SE), Maputo Central Hospital (MZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tissue microarray validation in cervical carcinoma studies. A methodological approach. — Lucília Lovane, Carla Carrilho, et al. · PubMed (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS