Parent–child contact during placement and mental health: A meta‐analysis

Abstract Objective This meta‐analysis aimed to synthesize research findings on the association between contact with biological parents and mental health in the context of out‐of‐home care. Background Although contact with biological parents is the primary intervention for maintaining the relationship with placed children, the consequences on child mental health are still unknown. Method Six electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished studies and dissertations. Results Twenty studies comprising 96 effect sizes ( N = 5,276) were included. Findings from a three‐level random effects meta‐analysis revealed that the combined effect of contact with biological parents on mental health was not significant ( k = 20, u = 96, r = .02). Moderation analyses revealed weaker effect sizes in samples with greater proportions of children who were physically abused or placed in nonrelative foster care. Conversely, parental visitation was more strongly associated with mental health outcomes in samples in which frequency of contact was at least weekly. Conclusion Regular parental visitation (at least weekly) is associated with better mental health outcomes. However, the benefits of parental visitation are reduced among physically abused children and those placed in nonrelative foster care. Implications Moderator analyses suggest that considering parental visitation to be beneficial for children is an oversimplification. Instead, child welfare services should prioritize examination of factors associated with positive parent–child contact for optimal visitation measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Relations
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.13204
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parent–child contact during placement and mental health: A meta‐analysis

Raphaële Miljkovitch, Karine Dubois‐Comtois, Aino Sirparanta, Camille Danner Touati et al.
1 citations
Family Relations
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
article

Parent–child contact during placement and mental health: A meta‐analysis

Raphaële Miljkovitch, Karine Dubois‐Comtois, Aino Sirparanta, Camille Danner Touati, Emylie Giguère
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective This meta‐analysis aimed to synthesize research findings on the association between contact with biological parents and mental health in the context of out‐of‐home care. Background Although contact with biological parents is the primary intervention for maintaining the relationship with placed children, the consequences on child mental health are still unknown. Method Six electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished studies and dissertations. Results Twenty studies comprising 96 effect sizes ( N = 5,276) were included. Findings from a three‐level random effects meta‐analysis revealed that the combined effect of contact with biological parents on mental health was not significant ( k = 20, u = 96, r = .02). Moderation analyses revealed weaker effect sizes in samples with greater proportions of children who were physically abused or placed in nonrelative foster care. Conversely, parental visitation was more strongly associated with mental health outcomes in samples in which frequency of contact was at least weekly. Conclusion Regular parental visitation (at least weekly) is associated with better mental health outcomes. However, the benefits of parental visitation are reduced among physically abused children and those placed in nonrelative foster care. Implications Moderator analyses suggest that considering parental visitation to be beneficial for children is an oversimplification. Instead, child welfare services should prioritize examination of factors associated with positive parent–child contact for optimal visitation measures.

Family RelationsVol. 74(4)
Université Paris Nanterre (FR), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (CA), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Université Paris 8 (FR), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.