Saddlepoint approximations for plug-in resampling

Abstract Resampling-based procedures can improve on normal approximations in sparse, large-scale testing problems, but their computational cost can be prohibitive. We recognize that several existing procedures belong to a faster plug-in resampling subclass, fixing fitted nuisance parameters during resampling. When the resampled statistic is a sum of conditionally independent terms, the saddlepoint approximation for the resampling p -value offers further acceleration, replacing resampling with an analytical tail approximation. However, standard Edgeworth-based approximation-error bounds impose regularity conditions that are hard to verify for plug-in resampling laws. We use an alternative approach to establish a finite-sample relative-error bound for the Lugannani–Rice approximation under more tractable conditions, which we apply in two contexts. In statistical genetics, we identify response resampling procedures as the targets of existing saddlepoint approximations and establish guarantees in a representative setting. In conditional independence testing, we introduce a saddlepoint approximation for the distilled conditional randomization test, which has been applied successfully in biology. Our rates quantify the effects of sparsity and signal strength, with matching lower bounds in special cases. We additionally establish asymptotic Type-I error control of the corresponding plug-in resampling procedures under growing sparsity. In simulations and single-cell CRISPR data analysis, our new test closely approximates distilled conditional randomization test p -values and preserves its statistical performance while accelerating computation by up to 250-fold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrika
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asag063
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saddlepoint approximations for plug-in resampling

Eugene Katsevich, Ziang Niu, Zhihan Huang, Jyotishka Ray Choudhury
Biometrika
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Saddlepoint approximations for plug-in resampling

Eugene Katsevich, Ziang Niu, Zhihan Huang, Jyotishka Ray Choudhury
article en

Abstract

Abstract Resampling-based procedures can improve on normal approximations in sparse, large-scale testing problems, but their computational cost can be prohibitive. We recognize that several existing procedures belong to a faster plug-in resampling subclass, fixing fitted nuisance parameters during resampling. When the resampled statistic is a sum of conditionally independent terms, the saddlepoint approximation for the resampling p -value offers further acceleration, replacing resampling with an analytical tail approximation. However, standard Edgeworth-based approximation-error bounds impose regularity conditions that are hard to verify for plug-in resampling laws. We use an alternative approach to establish a finite-sample relative-error bound for the Lugannani–Rice approximation under more tractable conditions, which we apply in two contexts. In statistical genetics, we identify response resampling procedures as the targets of existing saddlepoint approximations and establish guarantees in a representative setting. In conditional independence testing, we introduce a saddlepoint approximation for the distilled conditional randomization test, which has been applied successfully in biology. Our rates quantify the effects of sparsity and signal strength, with matching lower bounds in special cases. We additionally establish asymptotic Type-I error control of the corresponding plug-in resampling procedures under growing sparsity. In simulations and single-cell CRISPR data analysis, our new test closely approximates distilled conditional randomization test p -values and preserves its statistical performance while accelerating computation by up to 250-fold.

Biometrika
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.