Less can be more for predicting properties with large language models

Abstract Predicting properties from coordinate–category data—sets of vectors paired with categorical information—is fundamental to computational science, manifesting in materials science as predicting formation energies or elastic moduli from crystal structures. While large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been applied to such tasks, optimal strategies for achieving reliable predictions remain elusive. Here we report fundamental limitations in LLM’s ability to learn from coordinate information in coordinate–category data. Through systematic experiments using synthetic datasets with tunable coordinate and category contributions, and a comprehensive benchmarking framework (MatText), we find that LLMs consistently fail to capture coordinate information while excelling at category patterns. This geometric blindness persists regardless of model size (up to 70 billion parameters), dataset scale (up to 2 × 10 6 structures) or text representation strategy. For material property prediction tasks dominated by structural effects, specialized geometric architectures consistently outperform LLMs, as evidenced by a clear ‘Graph Neural Network Language Model (GNN-LM) wall’ in performance benchmarks. Our analysis provides concrete guidelines for architecture selection in scientific machine learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Computational Science
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-026-01045-2
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Less can be more for predicting properties with large language models

Santiago Miret, Kevin Maik Jablonka, Nawaf Alampara
13 citations
Nature Computational Science
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.40
article

Less can be more for predicting properties with large language models

Santiago Miret, Kevin Maik Jablonka, Nawaf Alampara
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Predicting properties from coordinate–category data—sets of vectors paired with categorical information—is fundamental to computational science, manifesting in materials science as predicting formation energies or elastic moduli from crystal structures. While large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been applied to such tasks, optimal strategies for achieving reliable predictions remain elusive. Here we report fundamental limitations in LLM’s ability to learn from coordinate information in coordinate–category data. Through systematic experiments using synthetic datasets with tunable coordinate and category contributions, and a comprehensive benchmarking framework (MatText), we find that LLMs consistently fail to capture coordinate information while excelling at category patterns. This geometric blindness persists regardless of model size (up to 70 billion parameters), dataset scale (up to 2 × 10 6 structures) or text representation strategy. For material property prediction tasks dominated by structural effects, specialized geometric architectures consistently outperform LLMs, as evidenced by a clear ‘Graph Neural Network Language Model (GNN-LM) wall’ in performance benchmarks. Our analysis provides concrete guidelines for architecture selection in scientific machine learning.

Nature Computational Science
Helmholtz Institute Jena (DE), Intel (United States) (US), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Helmholtz Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.