Deep multi-objective reinforcement learning for utility-based infrastructural maintenance optimization

In this paper, we introduce multi-objective deep centralized multi-agent actor-critic (MO-DCMAC), a multi-objective reinforcement learning method for infrastructural maintenance optimization, an area traditionally dominated by single-objective reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. Previous single-objective RL methods combine multiple objectives, such as probability of collapse and cost, into a singular reward signal through reward-shaping. In contrast, MO-DCMAC can optimize a policy for multiple objectives directly, even when the utility function is nonlinear. We evaluated MO-DCMAC using two utility functions, which use probability of collapse and cost as input. The first utility function is the threshold utility, in which MO-DCMAC should minimize cost so that the probability of collapse is never above the threshold. The second is based on the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis methodology used by asset managers to assess maintenance plans. We evaluated MO-DCMAC, with both utility functions, in multiple maintenance environments, including ones based on a case study of the historical quay walls of Amsterdam. The performance of MO-DCMAC was compared against multiple rule-based policies based on heuristics currently used for constructing maintenance plans. Our results demonstrate that MO-DCMAC outperforms traditional rule-based policies across various environments and utility functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neural Computing and Applications
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10954-0
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep multi-objective reinforcement learning for utility-based infrastructural maintenance optimization

Charalampos Andriotis, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian Zhang, Diederik M. Roijers et al.
7 citations
Neural Computing and Applications
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
6.67
article

Deep multi-objective reinforcement learning for utility-based infrastructural maintenance optimization

Charalampos Andriotis, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian Zhang, Diederik M. Roijers, Jesse van Remmerden, Maurice Kenter
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce multi-objective deep centralized multi-agent actor-critic (MO-DCMAC), a multi-objective reinforcement learning method for infrastructural maintenance optimization, an area traditionally dominated by single-objective reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. Previous single-objective RL methods combine multiple objectives, such as probability of collapse and cost, into a singular reward signal through reward-shaping. In contrast, MO-DCMAC can optimize a policy for multiple objectives directly, even when the utility function is nonlinear. We evaluated MO-DCMAC using two utility functions, which use probability of collapse and cost as input. The first utility function is the threshold utility, in which MO-DCMAC should minimize cost so that the probability of collapse is never above the threshold. The second is based on the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis methodology used by asset managers to assess maintenance plans. We evaluated MO-DCMAC, with both utility functions, in multiple maintenance environments, including ones based on a case study of the historical quay walls of Amsterdam. The performance of MO-DCMAC was compared against multiple rule-based policies based on heuristics currently used for constructing maintenance plans. Our results demonstrate that MO-DCMAC outperforms traditional rule-based policies across various environments and utility functions.

Neural Computing and ApplicationsVol. 37(30)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
6.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.