Entangled States are Typically Incomparable

Abstract Consider a bipartite quantum system, where Alice and Bob jointly possess a pure state $$|\psi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ . Using local quantum operations on their respective subsystems, and unlimited classical communication, Alice and Bob may be able to transform $$|\psi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ into another state $$|\phi \rangle $$ | ϕ ⟩ . Famously, Nielsen’s theorem [28] provides a necessary and sufficient algebraic criterion for such a transformation to be possible (namely, the entanglement spectrum of $$|\phi \rangle $$ | ϕ ⟩ should majorise the entanglement spectrum of $$|\psi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ ). In the paper where Nielsen proved this theorem, he conjectured that in the limit of large dimensionality, for almost all pairs of states $$|\psi \rangle , |\phi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ , | ϕ ⟩ (according to the natural unitary invariant measure) such a transformation is not possible. That is to say, typical pairs of quantum states $$|\psi \rangle , |\phi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ , | ϕ ⟩ are entangled in fundamentally different ways, that cannot be converted to each other via local operations and classical communication. Via Nielsen’s theorem, this conjecture can be equivalently stated as a conjecture about majorisation of spectra of random matrices from the so-called trace-normalised complex Wishart–Laguerre ensemble . Concretely, let X and Y be independent $$n \times m$$ n × m random matrices whose entries are i.i.d. standard complex Gaussians; then Nielsen’s conjecture says that the probability that the spectrum of $$X X^\dagger / \operatorname {tr}(X X^\dagger )$$ X X † / tr ( X X † ) majorises the spectrum of $$Y Y^\dagger / \operatorname {tr}(Y Y^\dagger )$$ Y Y † / tr ( Y Y † ) tends to zero as both n and m grow large. We prove this conjecture, and we also confirm some related predictions of Cunden et al. [12].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-026-05711-4
Primary Topic
Random Matrices and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entangled States are Typically Incomparable

Matthew Kwan, Marcus Michelen, Vishesh Jain
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Random Matrices and Applications
article

Entangled States are Typically Incomparable

Matthew Kwan, Marcus Michelen, Vishesh Jain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Consider a bipartite quantum system, where Alice and Bob jointly possess a pure state $$|\psi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ . Using local quantum operations on their respective subsystems, and unlimited classical communication, Alice and Bob may be able to transform $$|\psi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ into another state $$|\phi \rangle $$ | ϕ ⟩ . Famously, Nielsen’s theorem [28] provides a necessary and sufficient algebraic criterion for such a transformation to be possible (namely, the entanglement spectrum of $$|\phi \rangle $$ | ϕ ⟩ should majorise the entanglement spectrum of $$|\psi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ ). In the paper where Nielsen proved this theorem, he conjectured that in the limit of large dimensionality, for almost all pairs of states $$|\psi \rangle , |\phi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ , | ϕ ⟩ (according to the natural unitary invariant measure) such a transformation is not possible. That is to say, typical pairs of quantum states $$|\psi \rangle , |\phi \rangle $$ | ψ ⟩ , | ϕ ⟩ are entangled in fundamentally different ways, that cannot be converted to each other via local operations and classical communication. Via Nielsen’s theorem, this conjecture can be equivalently stated as a conjecture about majorisation of spectra of random matrices from the so-called trace-normalised complex Wishart–Laguerre ensemble . Concretely, let X and Y be independent $$n \times m$$ n × m random matrices whose entries are i.i.d. standard complex Gaussians; then Nielsen’s conjecture says that the probability that the spectrum of $$X X^\dagger / \operatorname {tr}(X X^\dagger )$$ X X † / tr ( X X † ) majorises the spectrum of $$Y Y^\dagger / \operatorname {tr}(Y Y^\dagger )$$ Y Y † / tr ( Y Y † ) tends to zero as both n and m grow large. We prove this conjecture, and we also confirm some related predictions of Cunden et al. [12].

Communications in Mathematical PhysicsVol. 407(10)
Northwestern University (US), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
National Science Foundation, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Random Matrices and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.