A series of two-phase models for grain–fluid flows with dilatancy

Debris flows are a growing natural hazard as a result of climate change and population density. To effectively assess this hazard, simulating field-scale debris flows at a reasonable computational cost is crucial. We enhance existing debris flow models by rigorously deriving a series of depth-averaged shallow models with varying complexities describing the behaviour of grain–fluid flows, considering granular mass dilatancy and pore fluid pressure feedback. The most complete model includes a mixture layer with an upper fluid layer, and solves for solid and fluid velocity in the mixture and for the upper fluid velocity. Simpler models are obtained by assuming velocity equality in the mixture or single-layer descriptions with a virtual thickness. Simulations in a uniform configuration mimicking submarine landslides and debris flows reveal that these models are extremely sensitive to the rheology, the permeability (grain diameter) and initial volume fraction, parameters that are hard to measure in the field. Notably, velocity equality assumptions in the mixture hold true only for low permeability (corresponding to grain diameter $d=10^{-3}$ m). The one-layer models’ results can strongly differ from those of the complete model, for example, the mass can stop much earlier. One-layer models, however, provide a rough estimate of two-layer models when permeability is low, initial volume fraction is far from critical and the upper fluid layer is very thin. Our work with uniform settings highlights the need of developing two-layer models accounting for dilatancy and for an upper layer made either of fluid or grains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.131
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A series of two-phase models for grain–fluid flows with dilatancy

François Bouchut, A. Mangeney, G. Narbona-Reina, Enrique D. Fernández-Nieto et al.
4 citations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Landslides and related hazards
9.69
article

A series of two-phase models for grain–fluid flows with dilatancy

François Bouchut, A. Mangeney, G. Narbona-Reina, Enrique D. Fernández-Nieto, Elias Drach
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Debris flows are a growing natural hazard as a result of climate change and population density. To effectively assess this hazard, simulating field-scale debris flows at a reasonable computational cost is crucial. We enhance existing debris flow models by rigorously deriving a series of depth-averaged shallow models with varying complexities describing the behaviour of grain–fluid flows, considering granular mass dilatancy and pore fluid pressure feedback. The most complete model includes a mixture layer with an upper fluid layer, and solves for solid and fluid velocity in the mixture and for the upper fluid velocity. Simpler models are obtained by assuming velocity equality in the mixture or single-layer descriptions with a virtual thickness. Simulations in a uniform configuration mimicking submarine landslides and debris flows reveal that these models are extremely sensitive to the rheology, the permeability (grain diameter) and initial volume fraction, parameters that are hard to measure in the field. Notably, velocity equality assumptions in the mixture hold true only for low permeability (corresponding to grain diameter $d=10^{-3}$ m). The one-layer models’ results can strongly differ from those of the complete model, for example, the mass can stop much earlier. One-layer models, however, provide a rough estimate of two-layer models when permeability is low, initial volume fraction is far from critical and the upper fluid layer is very thin. Our work with uniform settings highlights the need of developing two-layer models accounting for dilatancy and for an upper layer made either of fluid or grains.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1008
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Junta de Andalucía, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, HORIZON EUROPE European Institute of Innovation and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Landslides and related hazards
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.