[A framework for promoting and evaluating "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action cycle: The ACT-RECIPE framework].
Objective In 2019, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare emphasized the importance of promoting "Kayoi-no-ba" (or "places to go") initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. However, it proposed no specific promotion measures or standardized evaluation frameworks. This study is intended to propose a framework for local government officials to promote and evaluate "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle.Methods The working group (WG) conducted a narrative review of research and extracted evaluation models and indicators that could be used to create the framework. The co-researcher review committee discussed a draft framework prepared by the WG, and the WG revised it based on the discussion; this process was repeated four times. Using the completed framework, we calculated the score of the "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and conducted regional correlation analyses on the relationship between the score of the "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and the number of "Kayoi-no-ba" per 1,000 older persons.Results The completed framework (named "ACT-RECIPE" by rearranging the underlined characters below) comprised the following six evaluation phases: (1) Comprehension: understanding the key lessons around disability and frailty prevention, and the necessity for "Kayoi-no-ba"; (2) Research and Planning: clarifying the current status of "Kayoi-no-ba," the strengths of the community, and the issues to be addressed through a community assessment, and developing a plan to resolve the issues; (3) Team Building and Collaboration: building a team by collaborating with organizations to solve problems; (4) Implementation: implementing the initiatives necessary to solve problems; (5) Evaluation: verifying changes in output and outcome indicators from the initiatives; and (6) Adjustment and Improvement: re-examining plans, teams, content, and goals based on the evaluation results. In these six phases, we designated 10 core items and accompanying subitems. The median score rate of the ACT-RECIPE framework in 50 municipalities was 75% for "Comprehension," 61% for "Research and Planning," 69% for "Team Building and Collaboration," 64% for "Implementation," 31% for "Evaluation," and 56% for "Adjustment and Improvement," and the mean ACT-RECIPE score rate was 57%. A significant positive correlation (r<sub>s</sub>=0.43, P=0.002) was observed between the ACT-RECIPE mean score rate and the number of "Kayoi-no-ba" per 1,000 older persons.Conclusion We proposed the ACT-RECIPE as a framework for promoting and evaluating "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle. We hope that this framework will lead to further progress in "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives and facilitate evaluation of their effectiveness according to the PDCA cycle.
Authors
- Yoshinori Fujiwara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-1696)
- Takuya Ueda
- Erika Kobayashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6333-7810)
- Shinji Hattori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-7045)
- Minoru Yamada (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3291-0175)
- Yuta Nemoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-0015)
- Junta Takahashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-6107)
- Toshiki Hata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-8774)
- Keiko Motokawa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3741-0340)
- Masataka Kuraoka
- Akihiko Kitamura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-240X)
- Hidenori Arai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9000-6849)
- Satoshi Seino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-8730)
- Yu Nofuji
- Hiroshi Murayama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-7763)
- Katsunori Kondo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-816X)
- Hiroki Mori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-2406)
Institutions
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- Tokyo Medical University (JP)
- Chiba University (JP)
- Institute for Health Economics and Policy (JP)
- Health Center (US)
- Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
- National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2024-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.23-093
- Primary Topic
- Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Type
- article