Invariant tensions from holography

A bstract We revisit the problem of defining an invariant notion of tension in gravity. For spacetimes whose asymptotics are those of a Defect CFT we propose two independent definitions: gravitational tension given by the one-point function of the dilatation current, and inertial tension, or stiffness, given by the norm of the displacement operator. We show that both reduce to the tension of the Nambu-Goto action in the limit of classical thin-brane probes. Subtle normalisations of the relevant Witten diagrams are fixed by the Weyl and diffeomorphism Ward identities of the boundary DCFT. The gravitational tension is not defined for domain walls, whereas stiffness is not defined for point particles. When they both exist these two tensions are in general different, but the examples of line and surface BPS defects in d = 4 show that superconformal invariance can identify them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep08(2024)028
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invariant tensions from holography

Zhongwu Chen, Constantin P. Bachas
Journal of High Energy Physics
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
article

Invariant tensions from holography

Zhongwu Chen, Constantin P. Bachas
article en

Abstract

A bstract We revisit the problem of defining an invariant notion of tension in gravity. For spacetimes whose asymptotics are those of a Defect CFT we propose two independent definitions: gravitational tension given by the one-point function of the dilatation current, and inertial tension, or stiffness, given by the norm of the displacement operator. We show that both reduce to the tension of the Nambu-Goto action in the limit of classical thin-brane probes. Subtle normalisations of the relevant Witten diagrams are fixed by the Weyl and diffeomorphism Ward identities of the boundary DCFT. The gravitational tension is not defined for domain walls, whereas stiffness is not defined for point particles. When they both exist these two tensions are in general different, but the examples of line and surface BPS defects in d = 4 show that superconformal invariance can identify them.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2024(8)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), École Normale Supérieure (BI)
CERN
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.