The effect of frames on engagement with quantum technology

Engaging a larger, non-specialist audience with quantum technology poses challenges as the theory underlying quantum technology is very different to what we experience in our everyday lives. Quantum technology is predicted to have a significant impact on society once it matures. This study ( $n = 637$ adults representative of the Dutch population) examined the effect of different frames on engagement – specifically, information seeking, internal efficacy, general interest and perceived knowledge – with quantum technology. The different frames were: enigmatic, explaining quantum physics, benefit, risk and balanced. Results indicated that framing quantum as enigmatic does not affect engagement, while explaining quantum physics positively influences general interest. Furthermore, emphasising a benefit of quantum technology increases participants’ internal efficacy, whereas highlighting both a benefit and a risk of quantum technology decreases perceived knowledge. Based on these findings, we offer practical advice for science communicators in the field and suggest further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Quantum Technology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00549-0
Primary Topic
Organizational and Employee Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of frames on engagement with quantum technology

Aletta Meinsma, Pieter E. Vermaas, Julia Cramer, Ionica Smeets et al.
EPJ Quantum Technology
Organizational and Employee Performance
article

The effect of frames on engagement with quantum technology

Aletta Meinsma, Pieter E. Vermaas, Julia Cramer, Ionica Smeets, Casper J. Albers
article en

Abstract

Engaging a larger, non-specialist audience with quantum technology poses challenges as the theory underlying quantum technology is very different to what we experience in our everyday lives. Quantum technology is predicted to have a significant impact on society once it matures. This study ( $n = 637$ adults representative of the Dutch population) examined the effect of different frames on engagement – specifically, information seeking, internal efficacy, general interest and perceived knowledge – with quantum technology. The different frames were: enigmatic, explaining quantum physics, benefit, risk and balanced. Results indicated that framing quantum as enigmatic does not affect engagement, while explaining quantum physics positively influences general interest. Furthermore, emphasising a benefit of quantum technology increases participants’ internal efficacy, whereas highlighting both a benefit and a risk of quantum technology decreases perceived knowledge. Based on these findings, we offer practical advice for science communicators in the field and suggest further research.

EPJ Quantum TechnologyVol. 13(1)
Leiden University (NL), University of Groningen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Organizational and Employee Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.