Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor

Computational methods for assessing the likely impacts of mutations, known as variant effect predictors (VEPs), are widely used in the assessment and interpretation of human genetic variation, as well as in other applications like protein engineering. Many different VEPs have been released to date, and there is tremendous variability in their underlying algorithms and outputs, and in the ways in which the methodologies and predictions are shared. This leads to considerable challenges for end users in knowing which VEPs to use and how to use them. Here, to address these issues, we provide guidelines and recommendations for the release of novel VEPs. Emphasising open-source availability, transparent methodologies, clear variant effect score interpretations, standardised scales, accessible predictions, and rigorous training data disclosure, we aim to improve the usability and interpretability of VEPs, and promote their integration into analysis and evaluation pipelines. We also provide a large, categorised list of currently available VEPs, aiming to facilitate the discovery and encourage the usage of novel methods within the scientific community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome biology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03572-z
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor

Alan F. Rubin, David M. McCandlish, Joseph A. Marsh, Benjamin Livesey et al.
20 citations
Genome biology
Genomics and Rare Diseases
25.44
article

Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor

Alan F. Rubin, David M. McCandlish, Joseph A. Marsh, Benjamin Livesey, Mihaly Badonyi, Kresten Lindorff‐Larsen, Andrew M. Glazer, Debora S. Marks, Lara A. Muffley, Rose Orenbuch, Julia Foreman, Jonathan Frazer, Mafalda Dias, Courtney A. Shearer, Lea M. Starita, Ben Lehner, Sushant Kumar, Frederick P. Roth
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Computational methods for assessing the likely impacts of mutations, known as variant effect predictors (VEPs), are widely used in the assessment and interpretation of human genetic variation, as well as in other applications like protein engineering. Many different VEPs have been released to date, and there is tremendous variability in their underlying algorithms and outputs, and in the ways in which the methodologies and predictions are shared. This leads to considerable challenges for end users in knowing which VEPs to use and how to use them. Here, to address these issues, we provide guidelines and recommendations for the release of novel VEPs. Emphasising open-source availability, transparent methodologies, clear variant effect score interpretations, standardised scales, accessible predictions, and rigorous training data disclosure, we aim to improve the usability and interpretability of VEPs, and promote their integration into analysis and evaluation pipelines. We also provide a large, categorised list of currently available VEPs, aiming to facilitate the discovery and encourage the usage of novel methods within the scientific community.

Genome biologyVol. 26(1)
Broad Institute (US), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), European Bioinformatics Institute (GB), University Health Network (CA), Harvard University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Pittsburgh (US), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Toronto (CA), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US), Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES), Center for Systems Biology (US), Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Johns Hopkins University, Wellcome Trust, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Australian Government, European Commission, Novo Nordisk, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Novo Nordisk Fonden, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, European Research Council, Center for Information Technology
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
25.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.