Green Insurance for Pesticide Reduction: Acceptability and Impact for French Viticulture

Abstract Green insurance can help producers manage the risks of transitioning to more environmentally friendly practices. We investigate the uptake determinant and potential pesticide reduction in the viticulture sector, a major pesticide user, using a choice experiment with 412 French growers. Correcting for sampling bias, we find that between 48 per cent and 60 per cent (depending on contract features) are likely to take up green insurance. The insurance offers compensation for yield losses caused by the failure to contain diseases of a Decision Support System targeting pesticide reduction. We find an average 45 per cent reduction in fungicide use for adopters and conclude that green insurance can be a cost-effective tool for achieving the EU’s ambitious pesticide objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaf002
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Insurance for Pesticide Reduction: Acceptability and Impact for French Viticulture

Cécile Aubert, Marianne Lefebvre, Niklas Möhring, Pauline Pedehour et al.
8 citations
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
9.03
article

Green Insurance for Pesticide Reduction: Acceptability and Impact for French Viticulture

Cécile Aubert, Marianne Lefebvre, Niklas Möhring, Pauline Pedehour, Yann Raineau, M. Raynal
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Green insurance can help producers manage the risks of transitioning to more environmentally friendly practices. We investigate the uptake determinant and potential pesticide reduction in the viticulture sector, a major pesticide user, using a choice experiment with 412 French growers. Correcting for sampling bias, we find that between 48 per cent and 60 per cent (depending on contract features) are likely to take up green insurance. The insurance offers compensation for yield losses caused by the failure to contain diseases of a Decision Support System targeting pesticide reduction. We find an average 45 per cent reduction in fungicide use for adopters and conclude that green insurance can be a cost-effective tool for achieving the EU’s ambitious pesticide objectives.

European Review of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 51(5)
CEA CESTA (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bonn (DE), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin (FR), Bordeaux Sciences Économiques (FR), Université d'Angers (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
9.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.