Conditional expectations given the sum of independent random variables with regularly varying densities
Abstract The conditional expectation $m_{X}(s)=\mathrm{E}[X|S=s]$ , where X and Y are two independent random variables with $S=X+Y$ , plays a key role in various actuarial applications. For instance, considering the conditional mean risk-sharing rule, $m_X(s)$ determines the contribution of the agent holding the risk X to a risk-sharing pool. It is also a relevant function in the context of risk management, for example, when considering natural capital allocation principles. The monotonicity of $m_X(\!\cdot\!)$ is particularly significant under these frameworks, and it has been linked to log-concave densities since Efron (1965). However, the log-concavity assumption may not be realistic in some applications because it excludes heavy-tailed distributions. We consider random variables with regularly varying densities to illustrate how heavy tails can lead to a nonmonotonic behavior for $m_X(\!\cdot\!)$ . This paper first aims to identify situations where $m_X(\!\cdot\!)$ could fail to be increasing according to the tail heaviness of X and Y . Second, the paper aims to study the asymptotic behavior of $m_X(s)$ as the value s of the sum gets large. The analysis is then extended to zero-augmented probability distributions, commonly encountered in applications to insurance, and to sums of more than two random variables and to two random variables with a Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern copula. Consequences for risk sharing and capital allocation are discussed. Many numerical examples illustrate the results.
Authors
- Patricia Ortega-Jiménez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-7522)
- Christian Y. Robert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-5658)
- Michel Denuit
Institutions
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR)
- UCLouvain (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Astin Bulletin
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2025.11
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Probability and Risk Models
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.21
Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek