Systematic study of projection biases in the weak lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

This paper presents the results of a systematic study of projection biases in the weak lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using data collected during the first year of running the Dark Energy Survey experiment. The study uses Lambda cold dark matter ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\text{CDM}$) as the cosmological model and two-point correlation functions for the weak lensing (WL) analysis. The results in this paper show that, independent of the WL analysis, projection biases of more than $1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ exist and are a function of the position of the true values of the parameters $h$, ${n}_{s}$, ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{b}$, and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}{h}^{2}$ with respect to their prior probabilities. For cosmic shear, and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, this study shows that the coverage probability of the 68.27% credible intervals ranges from as high as 93% to as low as 16% and that these credible intervals are inflated, on average, by 29% for cosmic shear and 20% for the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing. The results of the study also show that, in six out of nine tested cases, the reduction in error bars obtained by transforming credible intervals into confidence intervals is equivalent to an increase in the amount of data by a factor of 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.103543
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic study of projection biases in the weak lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Gaston Gutierrez, P. Chintalapati, M. Wang
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
0.33
article

Systematic study of projection biases in the weak lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Gaston Gutierrez, P. Chintalapati, M. Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a systematic study of projection biases in the weak lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using data collected during the first year of running the Dark Energy Survey experiment. The study uses Lambda cold dark matter ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\text{CDM}$) as the cosmological model and two-point correlation functions for the weak lensing (WL) analysis. The results in this paper show that, independent of the WL analysis, projection biases of more than $1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ exist and are a function of the position of the true values of the parameters $h$, ${n}_{s}$, ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{b}$, and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}{h}^{2}$ with respect to their prior probabilities. For cosmic shear, and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, this study shows that the coverage probability of the 68.27% credible intervals ranges from as high as 93% to as low as 16% and that these credible intervals are inflated, on average, by 29% for cosmic shear and 20% for the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing. The results of the study also show that, in six out of nine tested cases, the reduction in error bars obtained by transforming credible intervals into confidence intervals is equivalent to an increase in the amount of data by a factor of 3.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(10)
Northern Illinois University (US), Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, High Energy Physics, Fermilab
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systematic study of projection biases in the weak lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing — Gaston Gutierrez, P. Chintalapati, et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS