Designing multi‐site studies for external validity: Site selection via synthetic purposive sampling

Abstract Multi‐site/context studies have become popular strategies to address the most common and challenging external validity concerns about contexts. Under such studies, scholars conduct causal studies in each site and evaluate whether findings generalize across sites. Despite the potential, there has been little guidance on the fundamental research design question—how should we select sites for external validity? Existing approaches have challenges: random sampling of sites is often infeasible, while the current practice of purposive sampling is suboptimal without statistical guarantees. We propose synthetic purposive sampling (SPS), which optimally selects diverse sites for external validity. SPS combines ideas of purposive sampling and the synthetic control method—it selects diverse sites such that nonselected sites are well approximated by the weighted average of the selected sites. We illustrate its general applicability using both experimental and observational studies. Overall, this paper offers a new statistical foundation to design multisite studies for external validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Political Science
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.70070
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Designing multi‐site studies for external validity: Site selection via synthetic purposive sampling

Naoki Egami, Diana Da In Lee
7 citations
American Journal of Political Science
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
17.99
article

Designing multi‐site studies for external validity: Site selection via synthetic purposive sampling

Naoki Egami, Diana Da In Lee
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Multi‐site/context studies have become popular strategies to address the most common and challenging external validity concerns about contexts. Under such studies, scholars conduct causal studies in each site and evaluate whether findings generalize across sites. Despite the potential, there has been little guidance on the fundamental research design question—how should we select sites for external validity? Existing approaches have challenges: random sampling of sites is often infeasible, while the current practice of purposive sampling is suboptimal without statistical guarantees. We propose synthetic purposive sampling (SPS), which optimally selects diverse sites for external validity. SPS combines ideas of purposive sampling and the synthetic control method—it selects diverse sites such that nonselected sites are well approximated by the weighted average of the selected sites. We illustrate its general applicability using both experimental and observational studies. Overall, this paper offers a new statistical foundation to design multisite studies for external validity.

American Journal of Political Science
Vanderbilt University (US), Vanderbilt Health (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Columbia University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
17.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.