A comparison of mixed-models for the analysis of non-linear longitudinal data: application to late-life cognitive trajectories

Several mixed-effects models for Gaussian longitudinal outcomes have been proposed to accommodate the non-linearity of late-life cognitive trajectories and assess the putative influence of covariates on it. No prior research provides a side-by-side examination of these models to offer guidance on their proper application and interpretation. In this work, we examined five statistical approaches commonly used to answer research questions related to non-linear changes in cognitive aging: the linear mixed model with a quadratic term, the linear mixed model with a function of time approximated with splines, the functional mixed model, the piecewise linear mixed model, and the sigmoidal mixed model. We first theoretically describe the models. Next, we conducted a simulation study to evaluate the models empirically and provide practical recommendations. Lastly, using real data from two prospective cohorts with annual cognitive testing, we compared the interpretation of the models by examining the associations between education and cognitive change before death. Except for the linear mixed model with a quadratic term for time, the fit of all models was generally adequate in capturing the non-linearity of cognitive change, and models were relatively robust. Although spline-based models have time-related parameters that are not directly interpretable, their convergence was easier to achieve, and they allow for graphical interpretation. In contrast, piecewise and sigmoidal models provide directly interpretable parameters but may require more data to achieve convergence. This study provided insights into how each strategy can help better characterize cognitive change over time. By performing simulations, we also emphasized that a quadratic function of time is not recommended in the context of these data. Lastly, we highlighted that more sophisticated models for longitudinal data, such as the piecewise and sigmoidal mixed models, should be considered more frequently in applications than they currently are.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02967-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of mixed-models for the analysis of non-linear longitudinal data: application to late-life cognitive trajectories

Tianhao Wang, Maude Wagner, Don Hedeker
1 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
5.27
article

A comparison of mixed-models for the analysis of non-linear longitudinal data: application to late-life cognitive trajectories

Tianhao Wang, Maude Wagner, Don Hedeker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Several mixed-effects models for Gaussian longitudinal outcomes have been proposed to accommodate the non-linearity of late-life cognitive trajectories and assess the putative influence of covariates on it. No prior research provides a side-by-side examination of these models to offer guidance on their proper application and interpretation. In this work, we examined five statistical approaches commonly used to answer research questions related to non-linear changes in cognitive aging: the linear mixed model with a quadratic term, the linear mixed model with a function of time approximated with splines, the functional mixed model, the piecewise linear mixed model, and the sigmoidal mixed model. We first theoretically describe the models. Next, we conducted a simulation study to evaluate the models empirically and provide practical recommendations. Lastly, using real data from two prospective cohorts with annual cognitive testing, we compared the interpretation of the models by examining the associations between education and cognitive change before death. Except for the linear mixed model with a quadratic term for time, the fit of all models was generally adequate in capturing the non-linearity of cognitive change, and models were relatively robust. Although spline-based models have time-related parameters that are not directly interpretable, their convergence was easier to achieve, and they allow for graphical interpretation. In contrast, piecewise and sigmoidal models provide directly interpretable parameters but may require more data to achieve convergence. This study provided insights into how each strategy can help better characterize cognitive change over time. By performing simulations, we also emphasized that a quadratic function of time is not recommended in the context of these data. Lastly, we highlighted that more sophisticated models for longitudinal data, such as the piecewise and sigmoidal mixed models, should be considered more frequently in applications than they currently are.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
Rush University Medical Center (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Alzheimer Scotland (GB), Dementia UK (GB), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
Alzheimer's Association, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
5.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.