The geometric error is less than the pollution error when solving the high-frequency Helmholtz equation with high-order FEM on curved domains

Abstract We consider the $h$-version of the finite-element method, where accuracy is increased by decreasing the meshwidth $h$ while keeping the polynomial degree $p$ constant, applied to the Helmholtz equation. Although the question ‘how quickly must $h$ decrease as the wavenumber $k$ increases to maintain accuracy?’ has been studied intensively since the 1990s, none of the existing rigorous wavenumber-explicit analyses take into account the approximation of the geometry. In this paper we prove that for nontrapping problems solved using straight elements the geometric error is of order $kh$, which is then less than the pollution error $k(kh)^{2p}$ when $k$ is large; this fact is then illustrated in numerical experiments. More generally, we prove that, even for problems with strong trapping, using degree four (in two dimensions) or degree five (in three dimensions) polynomials and isoparametric elements ensures that the geometric error is smaller than the pollution error for most large wavenumbers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/draf035
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The geometric error is less than the pollution error when solving the high-frequency Helmholtz equation with high-order FEM on curved domains

Théophile Chaumont-Frelet, Euan A. Spence
3 citations
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
4.00
article

The geometric error is less than the pollution error when solving the high-frequency Helmholtz equation with high-order FEM on curved domains

Théophile Chaumont-Frelet, Euan A. Spence
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We consider the $h$-version of the finite-element method, where accuracy is increased by decreasing the meshwidth $h$ while keeping the polynomial degree $p$ constant, applied to the Helmholtz equation. Although the question ‘how quickly must $h$ decrease as the wavenumber $k$ increases to maintain accuracy?’ has been studied intensively since the 1990s, none of the existing rigorous wavenumber-explicit analyses take into account the approximation of the geometry. In this paper we prove that for nontrapping problems solved using straight elements the geometric error is of order $kh$, which is then less than the pollution error $k(kh)^{2p}$ when $k$ is large; this fact is then illustrated in numerical experiments. More generally, we prove that, even for problems with strong trapping, using degree four (in two dimensions) or degree five (in three dimensions) polynomials and isoparametric elements ensures that the geometric error is smaller than the pollution error for most large wavenumbers.

IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
Prediction Systems (United States) (US), Laboratoire Paul Painlevé (FR), University of Bath (GB)
University College London
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
4.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The geometric error is less than the pollution error when solving the high-frequency Helmholtz equation with high-order FEM on curved domains — Théophile Chaumont-Frelet, Euan A. Spence · IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS