El “Derecho a la Ciudad” entre la propuesta revolucionaria y la garantía estatal

The right to the city emerged as a proposal to reclaim urban space in the cities of late capitalism during the late twentieth century. However, as it began to be considered part of the rights guaranteed by the State or as slogans developed by international organizations like UN-Habitat, its original intention —reclaiming the faculties for space construction that urban inhabitants possess or possessed— became distorted. Currently, the right to the city, as seen in Ecuadorian legislation or constitutional decrees, is framed within the discourse of political practices for city management and administration. These practices recognize the social and environmental problems caused by urban life rhythms to ensure a type of "urban welfare." In this context, concepts such as urban sustainability or city resilience are imposed as public policies aimed at achieving the so-called "right to the city." Nonetheless, the right to the city has been stripped of its revolutionary character, becoming a guideline that perpetuates the inequality conditions of the capitalist system in urban spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Ciencias y Humanidades
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61497/kgcssg88
Primary Topic
Latin American Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

El “Derecho a la Ciudad” entre la propuesta revolucionaria y la garantía estatal

Daniel Ramos Trávez
Revista Ciencias y Humanidades
Latin American Urban Studies
article

El “Derecho a la Ciudad” entre la propuesta revolucionaria y la garantía estatal

Daniel Ramos Trávez
article en

Abstract

The right to the city emerged as a proposal to reclaim urban space in the cities of late capitalism during the late twentieth century. However, as it began to be considered part of the rights guaranteed by the State or as slogans developed by international organizations like UN-Habitat, its original intention —reclaiming the faculties for space construction that urban inhabitants possess or possessed— became distorted. Currently, the right to the city, as seen in Ecuadorian legislation or constitutional decrees, is framed within the discourse of political practices for city management and administration. These practices recognize the social and environmental problems caused by urban life rhythms to ensure a type of "urban welfare." In this context, concepts such as urban sustainability or city resilience are imposed as public policies aimed at achieving the so-called "right to the city." Nonetheless, the right to the city has been stripped of its revolutionary character, becoming a guideline that perpetuates the inequality conditions of the capitalist system in urban spaces.

Revista Ciencias y HumanidadesVol. 9(9)
Central University of Ecuador (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Latin American Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

El “Derecho a la Ciudad” entre la propuesta revolucionaria y la garantía estatal — Daniel Ramos Trávez · Revista Ciencias y Humanidades (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS