MTD-DS: An SLA-Aware Decision Support Benchmark for Multi-Tenant Parallel DBMSs
Multi-tenant DBMSs are used by cloud providers for their Database-as-a-Service products. They could be single-node DBMSs installed in virtual machines, SQL-on-Hadoop systems or classic parallel relational DBMSs running on top of a shared-nothing or shared-disk architecture. For a cloud provider, it is interesting to measure these systems’ capability of dealing with multi-tenant workloads, i.e., taking advantage of the statistical multiplexing to obtain economic gain while being attractive by providing a good quality of service and a low bill to the tenants. In this paper, we present MTD-DS benchmark (with MTD for Multi-Tenant parallel DBMSs and DS for Decision Support). MTD-DS extends TPC-DS by adding a multi-tenant query workload generator, a performance Service Level Objectives generator, configurable Database-as-a-Service pricing models, and new metrics to measure the potential capability of a multi-tenant parallel DBMS in obtaining the best trade-off between the provider's benefit and the tenants’ satisfaction. Example experimental results have been produced to show the relevance and the feasibility of the MTD-DS benchmark.
Authors
- Jorge Martínez-Gil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5730-7965)
- Abdelkader Hameurlain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-6108)
- Franck Morvan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1390-9495)
- Shaoyi Yin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-2443)
Institutions
- Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
- Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR)
- Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (FR)
- Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) (AT)
- Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
- Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2025-02-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2025.3543727
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.25