Failure of the Curvature-Dimension Condition in Sub-Finsler Manifolds

Abstract The Lott–Sturm–Villani curvature-dimension condition $$\textsf{CD}(K,N)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>CD</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> provides a synthetic notion for a metric measure space to have curvature bounded from below by K and dimension bounded from above by N . It has been recently proved that this condition does not hold in Sub-Riemannian geometry for every choice of the parameters K and N . In this paper, we extend this result to the context Sub-Finsler geometry, showing that the $$\textsf{CD}(K,N)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>CD</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> condition is not well-suited to characterize curvature in this setting. Firstly, we show that this condition fails in (strict) Sub-Finsler manifolds equipped with an analytic strongly convex norm and with a positive smooth measure. Secondly, we focus on the Sub-Finsler Heisenberg group, proving that curvature-dimension bounds cannot hold also when the reference norm is less regular, in particular when it is of class $$C^{1,1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> . Finally, we show the failure of the (weaker) measure contraction property $$\textsf{MCP}(K,N)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MCP</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in the Sub-Finsler Heisenberg group, equipped with a singular strictly convex norm and with a positive smooth measure. This result contrasts with what happens in the Sub-Riemannian Heisenberg group, which instead satisfies $$\textsf{MCP}(0,5)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MCP</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geometric Analysis
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-026-02511-z
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure of the Curvature-Dimension Condition in Sub-Finsler Manifolds

Mattia Magnabosco, Tommaso Rossi
3 citations
Journal of Geometric Analysis
Advanced Differential Geometry Research
article

Failure of the Curvature-Dimension Condition in Sub-Finsler Manifolds

Mattia Magnabosco, Tommaso Rossi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Lott–Sturm–Villani curvature-dimension condition $$\textsf{CD}(K,N)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>CD</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> provides a synthetic notion for a metric measure space to have curvature bounded from below by K and dimension bounded from above by N . It has been recently proved that this condition does not hold in Sub-Riemannian geometry for every choice of the parameters K and N . In this paper, we extend this result to the context Sub-Finsler geometry, showing that the $$\textsf{CD}(K,N)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>CD</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> condition is not well-suited to characterize curvature in this setting. Firstly, we show that this condition fails in (strict) Sub-Finsler manifolds equipped with an analytic strongly convex norm and with a positive smooth measure. Secondly, we focus on the Sub-Finsler Heisenberg group, proving that curvature-dimension bounds cannot hold also when the reference norm is less regular, in particular when it is of class $$C^{1,1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> . Finally, we show the failure of the (weaker) measure contraction property $$\textsf{MCP}(K,N)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MCP</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in the Sub-Finsler Heisenberg group, equipped with a singular strictly convex norm and with a positive smooth measure. This result contrasts with what happens in the Sub-Riemannian Heisenberg group, which instead satisfies $$\textsf{MCP}(0,5)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MCP</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .

Journal of Geometric AnalysisVol. 36(8)
Institut für Technische und Angewandte Physik (Germany) (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Advanced Differential Geometry Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.