Correcting Autodifferentiation in Neural ODE Training

Abstract. Does the use of autodifferentiation yield reasonable updates for deep neural networks (DNNs)? Specifically, when DNNs are designed to adhere to neural ODE architectures, can we trust the gradients provided by autodifferentiation? Through mathematical analysis and numerical evidence, we demonstrate that when neural networks employ high-order methods, such as linear multistep methods or explicit Runge–Kutta Methods (ERK), to approximate the underlying ODE flows, brute-force autodifferentiation often introduces artificial oscillations in the gradients that prevent convergence. In the case of leapfrog and 2-stage ERK, we propose simple postprocessing techniques that effectively eliminate these oscillations, correct the gradient computation, and thus return the accurate updates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1137/25m172673x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Correcting Autodifferentiation in Neural ODE Training

Yewei Xu, Shi Chen, Qin Li
1 citations
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Correcting Autodifferentiation in Neural ODE Training

Yewei Xu, Shi Chen, Qin Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Does the use of autodifferentiation yield reasonable updates for deep neural networks (DNNs)? Specifically, when DNNs are designed to adhere to neural ODE architectures, can we trust the gradients provided by autodifferentiation? Through mathematical analysis and numerical evidence, we demonstrate that when neural networks employ high-order methods, such as linear multistep methods or explicit Runge–Kutta Methods (ERK), to approximate the underlying ODE flows, brute-force autodifferentiation often introduces artificial oscillations in the gradients that prevent convergence. In the case of leapfrog and 2-stage ERK, we propose simple postprocessing techniques that effectively eliminate these oscillations, correct the gradient computation, and thus return the accurate updates.

SIAM Journal on Applied MathematicsVol. 86(5)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, Division of Graduate Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correcting Autodifferentiation in Neural ODE Training — Yewei Xu, Shi Chen, et al. · SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS