Polynomial Identity Testing and the Ideal Proof System: PIT Is in NP If and Only If IPS Can Be p-Simulated by a Cook-Reckhow Proof System

The Ideal Proof System (IPS) of Grochow & Pitassi (FOCS 2014, J. ACM, 2018) is an algebraic proof system that uses algebraic circuits to refute the solvability of unsatisfiable systems of polynomial equations. One potential drawback of IPS is that verifying an IPS proof is only known to be doable using Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT), which is solvable by a randomized algorithm, but whose derandomization, even into NSUBEXP, is equivalent to strong lower bounds. However, the circuits that are used in IPS proofs are not arbitrary, and it is conceivable that one could get around general PIT by leveraging some structure in these circuits. This proposal may be even more tempting when IPS is used as a proof system for Boolean Unsatisfiability, where the equations themselves have additional structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3798129.3800865
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
preprint
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Polynomial Identity Testing and the Ideal Proof System: PIT Is in NP If and Only If IPS Can Be p-Simulated by a Cook-Reckhow Proof System

Joshua A. Grochow
1 citations
Cryptography and Data Security
preprint

Polynomial Identity Testing and the Ideal Proof System: PIT Is in NP If and Only If IPS Can Be p-Simulated by a Cook-Reckhow Proof System

Joshua A. Grochow
preprint en
1 citations

Abstract

The Ideal Proof System (IPS) of Grochow & Pitassi (FOCS 2014, J. ACM, 2018) is an algebraic proof system that uses algebraic circuits to refute the solvability of unsatisfiable systems of polynomial equations. One potential drawback of IPS is that verifying an IPS proof is only known to be doable using Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT), which is solvable by a randomized algorithm, but whose derandomization, even into NSUBEXP, is equivalent to strong lower bounds. However, the circuits that are used in IPS proofs are not arbitrary, and it is conceivable that one could get around general PIT by leveraging some structure in these circuits. This proposal may be even more tempting when IPS is used as a proof system for Boolean Unsatisfiability, where the equations themselves have additional structure.

University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US)
National Science Foundation, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Cryptography and Data Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Polynomial Identity Testing and the Ideal Proof System: PIT Is in NP If and Only If IPS Can Be p-Simulated by a Cook-Reckhow Proof System — Joshua A. Grochow · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS