Lessons for Interactive Theorem Proving Researchers from a Survey of Coq Users

Abstract The Coq Community Survey 2022 was an online public survey of users of the Coq proof assistant conducted during February 2022. Broadly, the survey asked about use of Coq features, user interfaces, libraries, plugins, and tools, views on renaming Coq and Coq improvements, and also demographic data such as education and experience with Coq and other proof assistants and programming languages. The survey received 466 submitted responses, making it the largest survey of users of an interactive theorem prover (ITP) so far. We present the design of the survey, a summary of key results, and analysis of answers relevant to ITP technology development and usage. In particular, we analyze user characteristics associated with adoption of tools and libraries and make comparisons to adjacent software communities. Notably, we find that experience has significant impact on Coq user behavior, including on usage of tools, libraries, and integrated development environments (IDEs).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-025-09720-1
Primary Topic
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons for Interactive Theorem Proving Researchers from a Survey of Coq Users

Théo Zimmermann, Karl Palmskog, Ana de Almeida Borges, Érik Martin-Dorel et al.
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
article

Lessons for Interactive Theorem Proving Researchers from a Survey of Coq Users

Théo Zimmermann, Karl Palmskog, Ana de Almeida Borges, Érik Martin-Dorel, Alexander Serebrenik, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, Jean‐Rémy Falleri, Annalí Casanueva Artís
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Coq Community Survey 2022 was an online public survey of users of the Coq proof assistant conducted during February 2022. Broadly, the survey asked about use of Coq features, user interfaces, libraries, plugins, and tools, views on renaming Coq and Coq improvements, and also demographic data such as education and experience with Coq and other proof assistants and programming languages. The survey received 466 submitted responses, making it the largest survey of users of an interactive theorem prover (ITP) so far. We present the design of the survey, a summary of key results, and analysis of answers relevant to ITP technology development and usage. In particular, we analyze user characteristics associated with adoption of tools and libraries and make comparisons to adjacent software communities. Notably, we find that experience has significant impact on Coq user behavior, including on usage of tools, libraries, and integrated development environments (IDEs).

Journal of Automated ReasoningVol. 69(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (FR), Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (FR), Embedded Systems (United States) (US), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l’Information (FR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.