Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression

Abstract We investigate preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with a moderate to large number of data points ( $$10^4 \\le N \\le 10^7$$ 10 4 ≤ N ≤ 10 7 ). We develop and analyze two randomized preconditioners with complementary guarantees. For full-data KRR, RPCholesky preconditioning requires $$\\mathcal {O}(N^2)$$ O ( N 2 ) arithmetic operations for fixed accuracy under sufficiently rapid eigenvalue decay of the kernel matrix. For restricted KRR with $$k\\ll N$$ k ≪ N centers, KRILL preconditioning requires $$\\mathcal {O}((N+k^2)k\\log k)$$ O ( ( N + k 2 ) k log k ) operations with no eigenvalue-decay assumption. Experiments on benchmark and scientific data sets demonstrate the robustness of both methods relative to existing preconditioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Computational Mathematics
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-026-10360-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression

Joel A. Tropp, Mateo Díaz, Robert J. Webber, Ethan N. Epperly et al.
1 citations
Advances in Computational Mathematics
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
article

Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression

Joel A. Tropp, Mateo Díaz, Robert J. Webber, Ethan N. Epperly, Zachary Frangella
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with a moderate to large number of data points ( $$10^4 \le N \le 10^7$$ 10 4 ≤ N ≤ 10 7 ). We develop and analyze two randomized preconditioners with complementary guarantees. For full-data KRR, RPCholesky preconditioning requires $$\mathcal {O}(N^2)$$ O ( N 2 ) arithmetic operations for fixed accuracy under sufficiently rapid eigenvalue decay of the kernel matrix. For restricted KRR with $$k\ll N$$ k ≪ N centers, KRILL preconditioning requires $$\mathcal {O}((N+k^2)k\log k)$$ O ( ( N + k 2 ) k log k ) operations with no eigenvalue-decay assumption. Experiments on benchmark and scientific data sets demonstrate the robustness of both methods relative to existing preconditioners.

Advances in Computational MathematicsVol. 52(5)
California Institute of Technology (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Office of Naval Research, Office of Naval Research Global
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression — Joel A. Tropp, Mateo Díaz, et al. · Advances in Computational Mathematics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS