Statistical methods for partitioning ribbon and globally-distributed flux using data from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer

NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite collects data on energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) that can provide insight into the heliosphere boundary between our solar system and interstellar space. Using these data, scientists can construct maps of the ENA intensities (often, expressed in terms of flux) observed in all directions. The ENA flux observed in these maps is believed to come from at least two distinct sources: one source which manifests as a ribbon of concentrated ENA flux and one source (or possibly several) that results in a smoothly-varying globally-distributed flux. Each ENA source type and its corresponding ENA intensity map is of separate scientific interest.In this paper, we develop statistical algorithms for separating the total ENA intensity maps into two source-specific maps (ribbon and globally-distributed flux) and estimating corresponding uncertainty. Key advantages of the proposed method include enhanced model flexibility and improved propagation of estimation uncertainty. We evaluate the proposed methods on simulated data designed to mimic realistic data settings. We also propose new methods for estimating the center of the near-elliptical ribbon in the sky, which can be used in the future to study the location and variation of the local interstellar magnetic field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2026.2738231
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical methods for partitioning ribbon and globally-distributed flux using data from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer

Brian Weaver, Lauren J. Beesley, Kelly R. Moran, Grant David Meadors et al.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Statistical methods for partitioning ribbon and globally-distributed flux using data from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer

Brian Weaver, Lauren J. Beesley, Kelly R. Moran, Grant David Meadors, D. B. Reisenfeld, E. J. Zirnstein, P. H. Janzen, Dave Osthus
article en

Abstract

NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite collects data on energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) that can provide insight into the heliosphere boundary between our solar system and interstellar space. Using these data, scientists can construct maps of the ENA intensities (often, expressed in terms of flux) observed in all directions. The ENA flux observed in these maps is believed to come from at least two distinct sources: one source which manifests as a ribbon of concentrated ENA flux and one source (or possibly several) that results in a smoothly-varying globally-distributed flux. Each ENA source type and its corresponding ENA intensity map is of separate scientific interest.In this paper, we develop statistical algorithms for separating the total ENA intensity maps into two source-specific maps (ribbon and globally-distributed flux) and estimating corresponding uncertainty. Key advantages of the proposed method include enhanced model flexibility and improved propagation of estimation uncertainty. We evaluate the proposed methods on simulated data designed to mimic realistic data settings. We also propose new methods for estimating the center of the near-elliptical ribbon in the sky, which can be used in the future to study the location and variation of the local interstellar magnetic field.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences (EG), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), Astronomy and Space (AU)
Laboratory Directed Research and Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.