Objective quality assessment of medical images and videos: review and challenges

Abstract Quality assessment is a key element for the evaluation of hardware and software involved in image and video acquisition, processing, and visualization. In the medical field, user-based quality assessment is still considered more reliable than objective methods, which allow the implementation of automated and more efficient solutions. Regardless of increasing research on this topic in the last decade, defining quality standards for medical content remains a non-trivial task, as the focus should be on the diagnostic value assessed by expert viewers rather than the perceived quality from naïve viewers, and objective quality metrics should aim at estimating the first rather than the latter. In this paper, we present a survey of methodologies used for the objective quality assessment of medical images and videos, dividing them into visual quality-based and task-based approaches. Visual quality-based methods compute a quality index directly from visual attributes, while task-based methods, being increasingly explored, measure the impact of quality impairments on the performance of a specific task. A discussion on the limitations of state-of-the-art research on this topic is also provided, along with future challenges to be addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20292-x
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Image and Video Quality Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective quality assessment of medical images and videos: review and challenges

Maria G. Martini, António Pinheiro, Lucie Lévêque, Aladine Chetouani et al.
12 citations
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Image and Video Quality Assessment
2.99
article

Objective quality assessment of medical images and videos: review and challenges

Maria G. Martini, António Pinheiro, Lucie Lévêque, Aladine Chetouani, Lu Zhang, Rafael Rodrigues, Shaymaa Al-Juboori, Meriem Outtas, Houda Jebbari, Jesús Gutiérrez
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract Quality assessment is a key element for the evaluation of hardware and software involved in image and video acquisition, processing, and visualization. In the medical field, user-based quality assessment is still considered more reliable than objective methods, which allow the implementation of automated and more efficient solutions. Regardless of increasing research on this topic in the last decade, defining quality standards for medical content remains a non-trivial task, as the focus should be on the diagnostic value assessed by expert viewers rather than the perceived quality from naïve viewers, and objective quality metrics should aim at estimating the first rather than the latter. In this paper, we present a survey of methodologies used for the objective quality assessment of medical images and videos, dividing them into visual quality-based and task-based approaches. Visual quality-based methods compute a quality index directly from visual attributes, while task-based methods, being increasingly explored, measure the impact of quality impairments on the performance of a specific task. A discussion on the limitations of state-of-the-art research on this topic is also provided, along with future challenges to be addressed.

Multimedia Tools and ApplicationsVol. 84(25)
Université d'Orléans (FR), Inserm (FR), University of Beira Interior (PT), Kingston University London (GB), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Laboratoire Pluridisciplinaire de Recherche en Ingénierie des Systèmes, Mécanique et Energétique (FR), Institut d'Électronique et des Technologies du numéRique (FR), Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (FR), Instituto de Telecomunicações (PT), Université de Rennes (FR), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Rouen Normandie (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Universidade da Beira Interior, Instituto de Telecomunicações, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Image and Video Quality Assessment
2.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.