Concordance with Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder: Data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder

The use of guideline concordant pharmacological treatments was substantially higher than reported under naturalistic conditions. We speculate that basic provider education plus a collaborative approach to medication choice may have contributed to the high treatment concordance rates in this large national trial. As in other studies, few patient-specific factors were associated with the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64719/pb.4110
Citations
42
Primary Topic
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concordance with Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder: Data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder

Jane N. Kogan, Mark S. Bauer, Ellen B. Dennehy, Roy H. Perlis et al.
42 citations
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
article

Concordance with Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder: Data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder

Jane N. Kogan, Mark S. Bauer, Ellen B. Dennehy, Roy H. Perlis, and Gary S. Sachs
article en
42 citations

Abstract

The use of guideline concordant pharmacological treatments was substantially higher than reported under naturalistic conditions. We speculate that basic provider education plus a collaborative approach to medication choice may have contributed to the high treatment concordance rates in this large national trial. As in other studies, few patient-specific factors were associated with the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care.

Psychopharmacology BulletinVol. 40(3)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.