On-Orbit NiH2 Battery Performance and Problem Solving on the APEX Spacecraft

The Advanced Photovoltaic and Electronics eXperiments (APEX) spacecraft, launched in August 1994, contained an Electrical Power Subsystem which included two 10 Common Pressure Vessel nickel hydrogen batteries manufactured by Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. The spacecraft bus has fully supported over 18 months of on-orbit payload operations, well exceeding the mission requirement. Over the duration of the mission, three fundamentally different battery charging algorithms were used, as necessitated by two hardware failures. After each failure, engineers evaluated the available options for extending the mission and implemented the most desirable option. All three charging methods -- pressure-based, V/T-based, and recharge-ratio-based (with significant overcharging) -- have demonstrated acceptable battery performance for periods of at least several months each. The on-orbit phase of the APEX program demonstrated the flexibility of the APEX Electrical Power Subsystem and the robustness of the APEX batteries. This paper gives an overview of the APEX Common Pressure Vessel and battery designs, summarizes the different charging methods that have been used, and presents on-orbit performance data for each method. Data for an incident where the batteries got very cold and may have begun to freeze are also presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26077/9sbt-3s86
Primary Topic
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On-Orbit NiH2 Battery Performance and Problem Solving on the APEX Spacecraft

Matthew Machlis
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
article

On-Orbit NiH2 Battery Performance and Problem Solving on the APEX Spacecraft

Matthew Machlis
article en

Abstract

The Advanced Photovoltaic and Electronics eXperiments (APEX) spacecraft, launched in August 1994, contained an Electrical Power Subsystem which included two 10 Common Pressure Vessel nickel hydrogen batteries manufactured by Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. The spacecraft bus has fully supported over 18 months of on-orbit payload operations, well exceeding the mission requirement. Over the duration of the mission, three fundamentally different battery charging algorithms were used, as necessitated by two hardware failures. After each failure, engineers evaluated the available options for extending the mission and implemented the most desirable option. All three charging methods -- pressure-based, V/T-based, and recharge-ratio-based (with significant overcharging) -- have demonstrated acceptable battery performance for periods of at least several months each. The on-orbit phase of the APEX program demonstrated the flexibility of the APEX Electrical Power Subsystem and the robustness of the APEX batteries. This paper gives an overview of the APEX Common Pressure Vessel and battery designs, summarizes the different charging methods that have been used, and presents on-orbit performance data for each method. Data for an incident where the batteries got very cold and may have begun to freeze are also presented.

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Northrop Grumman (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On-Orbit NiH2 Battery Performance and Problem Solving on the APEX Spacecraft — Matthew Machlis · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS