The dimensionality of plant–plant competition

To avoid extinction, every species must be able to exploit available resources at least as well as all other species in its community. Theory predicts that, the more distinct the niches of competing species, the more species that can coexist together. However, both theoretical and experimental studies define a priori the nature and number of resources over which species presumably compete. It therefore remains unclear whether species in empirically realistic contexts actually fill all of the niches available to them. Here, we show how the interactions between co-occurring species can be used to quantify their implied "niche dimensionality": the effective number of axes over which those species show niche differentiation. We then apply this approach to data from 12 plant assemblages distributed across the globe. Contrary to expectation, we find that their niche dimensionality was much lower than the number of species. However, data from two high-resolution experiments show that changes to the local environment reshuffle plants' competitive roles and hence act to increase the assemblages' emergent niche dimensionality. Our results therefore reinforce the notion that homogeneous environments are less capable of maintaining high diversity while also highlighting how environmental variation shapes species' niches and hence moderates their long-term survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76980-9
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dimensionality of plant–plant competition

Daniel B. Stouffer, Óscar Godoy, Margaret M. Mayfield, Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva
6 citations
Nature Communications
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

The dimensionality of plant–plant competition

Daniel B. Stouffer, Óscar Godoy, Margaret M. Mayfield, Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva
article en
6 citations

Abstract

To avoid extinction, every species must be able to exploit available resources at least as well as all other species in its community. Theory predicts that, the more distinct the niches of competing species, the more species that can coexist together. However, both theoretical and experimental studies define a priori the nature and number of resources over which species presumably compete. It therefore remains unclear whether species in empirically realistic contexts actually fill all of the niches available to them. Here, we show how the interactions between co-occurring species can be used to quantify their implied "niche dimensionality": the effective number of axes over which those species show niche differentiation. We then apply this approach to data from 12 plant assemblages distributed across the globe. Contrary to expectation, we find that their niche dimensionality was much lower than the number of species. However, data from two high-resolution experiments show that changes to the local environment reshuffle plants' competitive roles and hence act to increase the assemblages' emergent niche dimensionality. Our results therefore reinforce the notion that homogeneous environments are less capable of maintaining high diversity while also highlighting how environmental variation shapes species' niches and hence moderates their long-term survival.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Canterbury (NZ), Universidad de Cádiz (ES), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, New Zealand Government, Royal Society, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Marsden Fund, European Social Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.