Behavioral Market Design for Online Gaming Platforms

In this paper, we investigate market design for online gaming platforms. We ask what motivates people to continue participation—success or failure. Using data from an online chess platform, we find strong evidence of heterogeneous history-dependent stopping behavior. We identify two behavioral types of people: those who are more likely to stop playing after a loss and those who are more likely to stop playing after a win. We propose a behavioral dynamic choice model in which the utility from playing another game is directly affected by the previous game’s outcome. We estimate this time nonseparable preference model and conduct counterfactual analyses to study alternative market designs. A matching algorithm designed to leverage stopping behavior can substantially alter the length of play. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.03628 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.03628
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral Market Design for Online Gaming Platforms

Giorgi Mekerishvili, Ala Avoyan, Robizon Khubulashvili
7 citations
Management Science
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
2.56
article

Behavioral Market Design for Online Gaming Platforms

Giorgi Mekerishvili, Ala Avoyan, Robizon Khubulashvili
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate market design for online gaming platforms. We ask what motivates people to continue participation—success or failure. Using data from an online chess platform, we find strong evidence of heterogeneous history-dependent stopping behavior. We identify two behavioral types of people: those who are more likely to stop playing after a loss and those who are more likely to stop playing after a win. We propose a behavioral dynamic choice model in which the utility from playing another game is directly affected by the previous game’s outcome. We estimate this time nonseparable preference model and conduct counterfactual analyses to study alternative market designs. A matching algorithm designed to leverage stopping behavior can substantially alter the length of play. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.03628 .

Management ScienceVol. 71(6)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), HealthPartners (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
2.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Behavioral Market Design for Online Gaming Platforms — Giorgi Mekerishvili, Ala Avoyan, et al. · Management Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS