LOSS ASSESSMENT OF TALL BUILDINGS FROM A VULNERABILITY PERSPECTIVE

As the number of tall buildings in seismic areas around the world continues to grow, the ability to perform loss assessments
\nbecomes increasingly important. Due to their size, tall buildings house many businesses and/or residents, and any damage to
\nthese buildings has the potential to affect a large number of people. Furthermore, these buildings are expensive to build and
\nrepair. The financial resources needed to recover from the damage induced by earthquakes are generally not trivial amounts,
\nand thus the ability to realistically model losses in tall buildings becomes essential.
\nThe loss assessment of tall buildings presents unique challenges, including the tendency for significant damage to be
\nconcentrated in a few stories rather than distributed throughout the building. The presence of excessive residual drifts in one
\nor a few stories can result in the building being declared a total loss and demolished, even when the levels of damage in the
\nrest of the building are relatively low. Accessibility issues can increase repair costs in a tall building relative to a shorter
\nbuilding as, for example, it is much easier to replace the window on the 2nd story of a 5-story building versus on the 20th
\nstory of a 50-story building. The long first-mode periods of tall buildings as well as the significant contribution of higher
\nmodes means that the ground motions used to assess the structural response must be carefully considered as both the low
\nfrequency and high frequency components of the ground motion affect the response.
\nThe evolution of building design is also an important factor in the loss assessment of tall buildings. The trend in
\nrecent years toward performance-based designs and a growing awareness for designs that reduce expected seismic losses
\nplay an important role in differentiating the expected losses of newer versus older tall buildings. This is in addition to the
\neffects of advances in building codes and design practice that are typically seen over time, such as improvements in
\ndesigning for ductility and reducing the risk of connection fractures in steel moment-resisting frames.
\nThis study examines the loss assessment of tall buildings from a vulnerability perspective, drawing on the unique
\ncharacteristics of tall buildings previously noted. It discusses how the vulnerability characteristics of tall buildings affect the
\nrelative seismic risk and uses examples of major cities in North America and New Zealand to illustrate the effects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71846/16-wcee-1113
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LOSS ASSESSMENT OF TALL BUILDINGS FROM A VULNERABILITY PERSPECTIVE

Laura Eads, Charles Menun
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

LOSS ASSESSMENT OF TALL BUILDINGS FROM A VULNERABILITY PERSPECTIVE

Laura Eads, Charles Menun
article en

Abstract

As the number of tall buildings in seismic areas around the world continues to grow, the ability to perform loss assessments
\nbecomes increasingly important. Due to their size, tall buildings house many businesses and/or residents, and any damage to
\nthese buildings has the potential to affect a large number of people. Furthermore, these buildings are expensive to build and
\nrepair. The financial resources needed to recover from the damage induced by earthquakes are generally not trivial amounts,
\nand thus the ability to realistically model losses in tall buildings becomes essential.
\nThe loss assessment of tall buildings presents unique challenges, including the tendency for significant damage to be
\nconcentrated in a few stories rather than distributed throughout the building. The presence of excessive residual drifts in one
\nor a few stories can result in the building being declared a total loss and demolished, even when the levels of damage in the
\nrest of the building are relatively low. Accessibility issues can increase repair costs in a tall building relative to a shorter
\nbuilding as, for example, it is much easier to replace the window on the 2nd story of a 5-story building versus on the 20th
\nstory of a 50-story building. The long first-mode periods of tall buildings as well as the significant contribution of higher
\nmodes means that the ground motions used to assess the structural response must be carefully considered as both the low
\nfrequency and high frequency components of the ground motion affect the response.
\nThe evolution of building design is also an important factor in the loss assessment of tall buildings. The trend in
\nrecent years toward performance-based designs and a growing awareness for designs that reduce expected seismic losses
\nplay an important role in differentiating the expected losses of newer versus older tall buildings. This is in addition to the
\neffects of advances in building codes and design practice that are typically seen over time, such as improvements in
\ndesigning for ductility and reducing the risk of connection fractures in steel moment-resisting frames.
\nThis study examines the loss assessment of tall buildings from a vulnerability perspective, drawing on the unique
\ncharacteristics of tall buildings previously noted. It discusses how the vulnerability characteristics of tall buildings affect the
\nrelative seismic risk and uses examples of major cities in North America and New Zealand to illustrate the effects.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.