Acute cardiovascular responses to slow and deep breathing in normotensive non-pregnant and pregnant women

Objective To compare the acute cardiovascular responses of non-pregnant and pregnant women to slow and deep breathing (SDB) at a range of breathing frequencies. Participants: Forty-one women (23 non-pregnant and 18 pregnant). Methods Participants completed five different breathing conditions in a randomised order (5-min duration); spontaneous breathing (S f r ), dynamic SDB breathing frequency (D f r ), and three fixed breathing frequencies of 4 breaths . min −1 (4F f r ), 6 breaths. min −1 (6F f r ), and 8 breaths. min −1 (8F f r ). Main Outcome Measures: Non-invasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure, heart rate and respired airflow were monitored continuously. Results The maximum amplitude of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during SDB was 2.1 times higher than during spontaneous breathing (S f r ) for both groups, maximising at 6 breaths . min −1 (0.25s ± 0.1 non-pregnant, 0.15s ± 0.1 pregnant). Although absolute RSA was significantly lower in pregnant women during spontaneous breathing (S f r ; 0.07s vs. 0.12s non-pregnant), SDB increased RSA to the same level as non-pregnant women’s spontaneous breathing levels. In both groups, the amplitude of blood pressure oscillations (both systolic and diastolic blood pressure) increased as breathing frequency declined, reaching a peak at 4 breaths . min −1 (4F f r ), which was up to 4.5 times higher (14.3%, 10 mmHg) than during spontaneous breathing (S f r ). Conclusion Cardiovascular responses maximised at ≤6 breaths . min −1 and acute haemodynamic responses to SDB are similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women, despite absolute differences under spontaneous breathing conditions. If blood pressure oscillations underpin the anti-hypertensive effect of SDB, the data indicate that these can be amplified in pregnant women at frequencies between 4 and 6 breaths . min −1 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Network Physiology
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2026.1913383
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute cardiovascular responses to slow and deep breathing in normotensive non-pregnant and pregnant women

Vanora A. Hundley, Malika Felton, Stephanie Grigsby
Frontiers in Network Physiology
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Acute cardiovascular responses to slow and deep breathing in normotensive non-pregnant and pregnant women

Vanora A. Hundley, Malika Felton, Stephanie Grigsby
article en

Abstract

Objective To compare the acute cardiovascular responses of non-pregnant and pregnant women to slow and deep breathing (SDB) at a range of breathing frequencies. Participants: Forty-one women (23 non-pregnant and 18 pregnant). Methods Participants completed five different breathing conditions in a randomised order (5-min duration); spontaneous breathing (S f r ), dynamic SDB breathing frequency (D f r ), and three fixed breathing frequencies of 4 breaths . min −1 (4F f r ), 6 breaths. min −1 (6F f r ), and 8 breaths. min −1 (8F f r ). Main Outcome Measures: Non-invasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure, heart rate and respired airflow were monitored continuously. Results The maximum amplitude of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during SDB was 2.1 times higher than during spontaneous breathing (S f r ) for both groups, maximising at 6 breaths . min −1 (0.25s ± 0.1 non-pregnant, 0.15s ± 0.1 pregnant). Although absolute RSA was significantly lower in pregnant women during spontaneous breathing (S f r ; 0.07s vs. 0.12s non-pregnant), SDB increased RSA to the same level as non-pregnant women’s spontaneous breathing levels. In both groups, the amplitude of blood pressure oscillations (both systolic and diastolic blood pressure) increased as breathing frequency declined, reaching a peak at 4 breaths . min −1 (4F f r ), which was up to 4.5 times higher (14.3%, 10 mmHg) than during spontaneous breathing (S f r ). Conclusion Cardiovascular responses maximised at ≤6 breaths . min −1 and acute haemodynamic responses to SDB are similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women, despite absolute differences under spontaneous breathing conditions. If blood pressure oscillations underpin the anti-hypertensive effect of SDB, the data indicate that these can be amplified in pregnant women at frequencies between 4 and 6 breaths . min −1 .

Frontiers in Network PhysiologyVol. 6
University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth University (GB)
Bournemouth University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.