Trade Policy Dynamics: Evidence from 60 Years of US-China Trade

We study China’s export growth to the United States from 1950 to 2008, using a structural model to disentangle the effects of past tariff changes from the effects of changes in expectations of future tariffs. We find that the effects of China’s 1980 Normal Trade Relations (NTR) grant lasted past its 2001 accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the likelihood of losing NTR status decreased significantly during 1986–92 but changed little thereafter. US manufacturing employment trends support our findings: industries more exposed to the 1980 reform have shed workers steadily since then without acceleration around China’s WTO accession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733420
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade Policy Dynamics: Evidence from 60 Years of US-China Trade

George Alessandria, Armen Khederlarian, Kim J. Ruhl, Joseph B. Steinberg et al.
9 citations
Journal of Political Economy
Global trade and economics
7.46
article

Trade Policy Dynamics: Evidence from 60 Years of US-China Trade

George Alessandria, Armen Khederlarian, Kim J. Ruhl, Joseph B. Steinberg, Shafaat Yar Khan
article en
9 citations

Abstract

We study China’s export growth to the United States from 1950 to 2008, using a structural model to disentangle the effects of past tariff changes from the effects of changes in expectations of future tariffs. We find that the effects of China’s 1980 Normal Trade Relations (NTR) grant lasted past its 2001 accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the likelihood of losing NTR status decreased significantly during 1986–92 but changed little thereafter. US manufacturing employment trends support our findings: industries more exposed to the 1980 reform have shed workers steadily since then without acceleration around China’s WTO accession.

Journal of Political EconomyVol. 133(3)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), City University of New York (US), University of Toronto (CA), Hunter College (US), University of Rochester (US), Syracuse University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global trade and economics
7.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.