Quantifying the impact of precision errors on quantum approximate optimization algorithms

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that seeks to achieve approximate solutions to optimization problems by iteratively alternating between intervals of controlled quantum evolution. Here, we examine the effect of analog precision errors on QAOA performance from the perspective of both algorithmic training and performance guarantees. Leveraging cumulant expansions, we recast the faulty QAOA as a control problem in which precision errors are expressed as multiplicative control noise and derive bounds on the performance of QAOA. We show using both analytical techniques and numerical simulations that fixed precision implementations of QAOA circuits are subject to an exponential degradation in performance dependent upon the number of optimal QAOA layers and magnitude of the precision error. Despite this significant reduction, we show that it is possible to mitigate precision errors in QAOA via digitization of the variational parameters at the cost of increasing circuit depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Research
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023240
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the impact of precision errors on quantum approximate optimization algorithms

Eugene Dumitrescu, Kevin Schultz, Paraj Titum, Phillip C. Lotshaw et al.
5 citations
Physical Review Research
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
7.44
article

Quantifying the impact of precision errors on quantum approximate optimization algorithms

Eugene Dumitrescu, Kevin Schultz, Paraj Titum, Phillip C. Lotshaw, Pavel Lougovski, Gregory Quiroz, Itay Hen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that seeks to achieve approximate solutions to optimization problems by iteratively alternating between intervals of controlled quantum evolution. Here, we examine the effect of analog precision errors on QAOA performance from the perspective of both algorithmic training and performance guarantees. Leveraging cumulant expansions, we recast the faulty QAOA as a control problem in which precision errors are expressed as multiplicative control noise and derive bounds on the performance of QAOA. We show using both analytical techniques and numerical simulations that fixed precision implementations of QAOA circuits are subject to an exponential degradation in performance dependent upon the number of optimal QAOA layers and magnitude of the precision error. Despite this significant reduction, we show that it is possible to mitigate precision errors in QAOA via digitization of the variational parameters at the cost of increasing circuit depth.

Physical Review ResearchVol. 7(2)
University of Southern California (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), California Southern University (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Quantum Science Center (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, UT-Battelle, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Defense Sciences Office, DARPA, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.