Why multiple hypothesis test corrections provide poor control of false positives in the real world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Methods
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000678
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why multiple hypothesis test corrections provide poor control of false positives in the real world.

Stanley E. Lazic
4 citations
Psychological Methods
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.38
article

Why multiple hypothesis test corrections provide poor control of false positives in the real world.

Stanley E. Lazic
article en
4 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological Methods
Prioris.ai (Canada) (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.38
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why multiple hypothesis test corrections provide poor control of false positives in the real world. — Stanley E. Lazic · Psychological Methods (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS