Stock return predictability and Taylor rules

Abstract This paper evaluates stock return predictability with inflation and output gap, which typically enter the Federal Reserve Bank's interest rate setting rule. We introduce Taylor rule fundamentals into the Fed model that relates stock returns to earnings and long‐term yields. Using real‐time data from 1970 to 2008, we find evidence that the Fed model with Taylor rule fundamentals performs better in‐sample and out‐of‐sample than the constant return and original Fed models. Economic significance tests indicate that the models with Taylor rule fundamentals consistently produce higher utility gains than the benchmark models. Though the performance of the Taylor rule model weakens when we extend the sample to include the post‐2008 period characterized by prolonged zero lower bound episodes, it still outperforms the benchmark models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Economics
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1215
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stock return predictability and Taylor rules

Lei Jiang, Onur Ulas Ince, Tanya Molodtsova
Review of Financial Economics
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Stock return predictability and Taylor rules

Lei Jiang, Onur Ulas Ince, Tanya Molodtsova
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper evaluates stock return predictability with inflation and output gap, which typically enter the Federal Reserve Bank's interest rate setting rule. We introduce Taylor rule fundamentals into the Fed model that relates stock returns to earnings and long‐term yields. Using real‐time data from 1970 to 2008, we find evidence that the Fed model with Taylor rule fundamentals performs better in‐sample and out‐of‐sample than the constant return and original Fed models. Economic significance tests indicate that the models with Taylor rule fundamentals consistently produce higher utility gains than the benchmark models. Though the performance of the Taylor rule model weakens when we extend the sample to include the post‐2008 period characterized by prolonged zero lower bound episodes, it still outperforms the benchmark models.

Review of Financial EconomicsVol. 43(1)
Kent State University (US), Walker (United States) (US), Appalachian State University (US)
Emory University, Auburn University
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.