The Economic Costs of NIMBYism: Evidence from Renewable Energy Projects

Large infrastructure projects have important social benefits but can also prompt strong local opposition. I estimate the economic costs of NIMBY (not in my backyard) attitudes and local planning restrictions by studying renewable energy projects. Using data on thousands of permitting applications, I show that wind and solar projects can have highly heterogeneous impacts depending on their characteristics and location. In some cases this includes significant external local costs, and I conduct a hedonic analysis to quantify the impact on nearby property values. I then show that planning officials are particularly sensitive to these local costs, especially when wealthy residents are affected. This often comes at the expense of considering the wider social benefits of these projects. These biases in the permitting process create inefficiencies that increased costs and led to substantial underinvestment in renewable energy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732801
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Economic Costs of NIMBYism: Evidence from Renewable Energy Projects

Stephen A. Jarvis
29 citations
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
15.85
article

The Economic Costs of NIMBYism: Evidence from Renewable Energy Projects

Stephen A. Jarvis
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Large infrastructure projects have important social benefits but can also prompt strong local opposition. I estimate the economic costs of NIMBY (not in my backyard) attitudes and local planning restrictions by studying renewable energy projects. Using data on thousands of permitting applications, I show that wind and solar projects can have highly heterogeneous impacts depending on their characteristics and location. In some cases this includes significant external local costs, and I conduct a hedonic analysis to quantify the impact on nearby property values. I then show that planning officials are particularly sensitive to these local costs, especially when wealthy residents are affected. This often comes at the expense of considering the wider social benefits of these projects. These biases in the permitting process create inefficiencies that increased costs and led to substantial underinvestment in renewable energy.

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource EconomistsVol. 12(4)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
15.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.