Monopsony and Employer Misoptimization Explain Why Wages Bunch at Round Numbers

We show that administrative hourly wage data exhibit considerable bunching at round numbers. We run two experiments randomizing wages around $0.10 and $1.00 to experimentally measure left-digit bias for identical tasks on Amazon Mechanical Turk; we fail to find any evidence of discontinuity in the labor supply function at round numbers despite estimating a considerable degree of monopsony. We replicate these results in administrative worker-firm hourly wage data from Oregon. We can rule out inattention estimates found in the behavioral product market literature. We provide evidence that firms “misoptimize” wage setting. More monopsony requires less employer misoptimization to explain bunching. (JEL D22, J22, J31, J42)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2025-07-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200678
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monopsony and Employer Misoptimization Explain Why Wages Bunch at Round Numbers

Suresh Naidu, Alan Manning, Arindrajit Dubé
2 citations
American Economic Review
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
article

Monopsony and Employer Misoptimization Explain Why Wages Bunch at Round Numbers

Suresh Naidu, Alan Manning, Arindrajit Dubé
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We show that administrative hourly wage data exhibit considerable bunching at round numbers. We run two experiments randomizing wages around $0.10 and $1.00 to experimentally measure left-digit bias for identical tasks on Amazon Mechanical Turk; we fail to find any evidence of discontinuity in the labor supply function at round numbers despite estimating a considerable degree of monopsony. We replicate these results in administrative worker-firm hourly wage data from Oregon. We can rule out inattention estimates found in the behavioral product market literature. We provide evidence that firms “misoptimize” wage setting. More monopsony requires less employer misoptimization to explain bunching. (JEL D22, J22, J31, J42)

American Economic ReviewVol. 115(8)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Columbia University (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.