Dissociative Multiplicity and Psychoanalysis

This paper examines the relationship between psychoanalysis and trauma, focusing specifically on dissociation-and, more narrowly, on <i>dissociative multiplicity</i>, the most challenging form for psychoanalysis to address. Dissociative multiplicity involves the presence of more than one center of consciousness, more than one "I," a feature of multiple personality, now called Dissociative Identity Disorder or DID, and OSDD-1, or subthreshold DID. The central question is whether classic psychoanalytic constructs, such as splitting, repression, various triadic views (oedipal, topographic, structural, Fairbairnian, Kohutian), object relations, and attachment theory, can adequately account for dissociative multiplicity. I explain how they cannot, but also how they remain applicable to multiplicity. I conclude with a summary view and reflection on what still needs to occur to reintegrate dissociation into mainstream psychoanalytic theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2025.2589158
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissociative Multiplicity and Psychoanalysis

John A. O’Neil
14 citations
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

Dissociative Multiplicity and Psychoanalysis

John A. O’Neil
article en
14 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between psychoanalysis and trauma, focusing specifically on dissociation-and, more narrowly, on <i>dissociative multiplicity</i>, the most challenging form for psychoanalysis to address. Dissociative multiplicity involves the presence of more than one center of consciousness, more than one "I," a feature of multiple personality, now called Dissociative Identity Disorder or DID, and OSDD-1, or subthreshold DID. The central question is whether classic psychoanalytic constructs, such as splitting, repression, various triadic views (oedipal, topographic, structural, Fairbairnian, Kohutian), object relations, and attachment theory, can adequately account for dissociative multiplicity. I explain how they cannot, but also how they remain applicable to multiplicity. I conclude with a summary view and reflection on what still needs to occur to reintegrate dissociation into mainstream psychoanalytic theory and practice.

Journal of Trauma & DissociationVol. 27(1)
McGill University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.